Autonomous Fleet Deployment Using Resource Performance Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicle fleets face inefficiencies in resource management, leading to wasteful usage of computational resources due to idle time and suboptimal deployment in operational domains, which affects safety, productivity, and environmental impact.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that evaluates autonomous vehicle fleets by determining resource performance parameters based on vehicle capabilities and service dynamics within operational domains, optimizing fleet size and deployment to minimize idle time and enhance resource utilization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If autonomous vehicle fleets are deployed without optimized fleet size determination, then service coverage in operational domains is maintained, but computational resources are wasted due to idle time and suboptimal deployment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational resource wasteVSAvoidservice coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of fleet size based on dynamic evaluation of vehicle capabilities and service dynamics. By determining optimal fleet sizes through resource performance parameters, the system adjusts deployment quantities to match actual service needs, reducing computational waste from idle vehicles while maintaining adequate service coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by evaluating vehicle capabilities and service dynamics continuously. Resource performance parameters are determined based on this feedback loop, allowing the system to adjust fleet deployment decisions dynamically. This ensures computational resources are utilized efficiently without compromising service coverage in operational domains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If fleet size is increased to improve service coverage, then productivity is improved, but computational resource usage increases due to more vehicles requiring processing power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidcomputational resource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes the parameter of fleet size by determining resource performance parameters that balance service coverage needs against computational resource consumption. This allows achieving maximum productivity with the minimum necessary fleet size, preventing excessive computational resource usage while maintaining adequate service coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If autonomous vehicles operate without optimized deployment, then operational flexibility is maintained, but resource efficiency deteriorates due to idle time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidresource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces dynamic optimization by determining fleet sizes based on evaluated resource performance parameters. This dynamic approach allows the fleet deployment to adapt to changing service dynamics while maintaining operational flexibility. The system balances the need for operational versatility with the requirement to minimize idle time and improve resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11507111B2Autonomous vehicle fleet management for improved computational resource usage
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11507111B2 patent drawing
  • US11507111B2 patent drawing
  • US11507111B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for evaluating and deploying fleets of autonomous in operational domains are described. A computing system may obtain data indicative of one or more capabilities of at least one autonomous vehicle, data indicative of vehicle service dynamics in an operational domain over a period of time, and determining a plurality of resource performance parameters respectively for a plurality of autonomous vehicle fleets associated with potential deployment in the operational domain. Each autonomous vehicle fleet can be associated with a different number of autonomous vehicles The resource performance parameter for each autonomous vehicle fleet can be based at least in part on the one or more capabilities of the at least one autonomous vehicle and the vehicle service dynamics in the operational domain. The computing system can initiate an action associated with the operational domain based at least in part on the plurality of resource performance parameters.