Autonomous Vehicle Routing for Dynamic Servicing and Fleet Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Human-operated vehicles often inefficiently distribute services due to unknown high-demand areas and personal preferences, and the integration of autonomous vehicles requires effective management of various activities typically performed by human drivers.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic transportation matching system that integrates both autonomous and non-autonomous vehicles, utilizing data analytics and sensor feedback to optimize route selection, maintenance, and service dispatch based on real-time data and demand patterns.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If human operators are used to provide transportation services, then personal preferences and flexibility are maintained, but service distribution efficiency deteriorates due to unknown high-demand areas and suboptimal routing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator flexibilityVSAvoidservice distribution efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the transportation fleet into autonomous vehicles that operate independently based on algorithmic dispatch, separating the decision-making function from human operators. This allows the system to optimize service distribution through data-driven routing while autonomous vehicles handle the physical transportation task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where ride data, demand patterns, and vehicle location information are collected and analyzed in real-time. This feedback enables dynamic adjustment of vehicle routing and dispatch decisions, improving service distribution efficiency by directing vehicles to high-demand areas identified through data analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If autonomous vehicles are deployed to improve service efficiency, then productivity increases through optimized routing and data-driven dispatch, but system complexity increases due to automation management requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle service efficiencyVSAvoidautomation management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicles are designed as multi-functional units that can perform transportation services, self-monitoring of maintenance needs, and data collection for fleet optimization. This universal design consolidates multiple functions into a single system, managing complexity through integration rather than separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicles perform self-service functions including autonomous navigation to service locations, self-monitoring of maintenance requirements through sensor data, and automated reporting to the fleet management system. This reduces the operational burden on human managers and simplifies the oversight required for autonomous fleet management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If autonomous vehicles operate independently without human operators, then service coverage in high-demand areas improves, but the ability to perform activities requiring human judgment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverage efficiencyVSAvoidhuman judgment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces human mechanical decision-making with algorithmic processing of ride data and demand patterns. Machine learning models analyze historical and real-time data to make routing and dispatch decisions, substituting human judgment with data-driven automated decision-making that can process更多信息 at higher speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of ride data and demand patterns to pre-determine optimal routing and dispatch decisions. By analyzing historical data beforehand, the system can anticipate high-demand areas and position autonomous vehicles proactively, improving service coverage without requiring real-time human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If real-time data collection and analysis are implemented to optimize vehicle dispatch, then service distribution efficiency improves, but information processing requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedispatch optimization efficiencyVSAvoiddata processing burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most critical data elements from the comprehensive ride data collected by autonomous vehicles, such as location information, demand patterns, and key performance metrics. This selective extraction focuses processing resources on the most impactful information while filtering out redundant data, reducing the information processing burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12423765B2Dynamic autonomous vehicle servicing and management
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 LYFT INC
  • US12423765B2 patent drawing
  • US12423765B2 patent drawing
  • US12423765B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a method includes determining, based on vehicle status information associated with a vehicle, that the vehicle is to be serviced at a service facility. The method includes identifying multiple routes between a current location of the vehicle and the service facility. Each of the multiple routes includes a multiple road segments that connect the current location to the service facility. The method includes selecting a route from the multiple routes based at least on the vehicle status information associated with the vehicle and at least one condition associated with one or more of the road segments of each of the multiple routes. The method includes instructing the vehicle to travel from the current location to the service facility along the selected route.