Autonomous Fraud Risk Management System for Near-Real-Time Trend Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fraud risk mitigation processes are complex, time-consuming, and resource-intensive, leading to delayed identification and ineffective strategies against rapidly changing fraud trends, exposing entities to significant risks.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous fraud risk management system that uses machine learning techniques, feature engineering, and a virtual analytics assistant to rapidly identify and deploy effective fraud rules, optimizing false positive rates, return on investment, and fraud rates, enabling near-real-time trend detection and mitigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual fraud risk mitigation processes are used with subject matter experts, then rule development can be performed with human oversight, but the process takes 3-4 weeks or longer to identify and implement fraud strategies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud trend identification accuracyVSAvoidstrategy deployment timeline
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables autonomous fraud rule development where the machine learning model automatically identifies fraud trends, generates rule recommendations, and optimizes parameters without requiring continuous human intervention. The autonomous fraud risk management system performs feature engineering, model training, and rule generation autonomously, reducing deployment time from weeks to days while maintaining accuracy through automated validation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes of expert analysis with automated machine learning systems. The ML model automatically performs feature engineering, identifies fraud patterns, and generates rule recommendations, substituting the manual analytical process of subject matter experts with an automated computational system that operates continuously and scales efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If extensive manual analysis and multiple expert reviews are conducted, then fraud rule accuracy can be improved, but the process becomes complex and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud rule effectivenessVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous fraud risk management system performs multiple functions within a single integrated platform: data collection, feature engineering, model training, rule generation, validation, and deployment. This multi-functional system consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate manual processes and expert reviews into one automated workflow, reducing overall process complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automated feedback loops where model performance is continuously evaluated against validation datasets, and rule effectiveness is monitored through performance metrics. This automated feedback mechanism replaces manual expert review cycles with systematic computational validation, ensuring rule reliability while streamlining the complexity of the validation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If traditional fraud detection methods are used, then existing fraud patterns can be detected, but the system cannot effectively address rapidly changing new fraud trends

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidresponse to new fraud trends
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic machine learning models that continuously adapt to new fraud patterns through automated retraining on recent transaction data. The feature engineering process dynamically identifies emerging fraud indicators, and the model parameters are automatically adjusted to reflect changing fraud trends, enabling the system to maintain detection reliability while adapting to new threats in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of transaction patterns to identify emerging fraud trends before they become widespread. By continuously monitoring data and using predictive analytics, the system detects early signs of new fraud methods and generates preventive rules in advance, allowing the organization to address threats proactively rather than reactively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12008583B2System and method for implementing autonomous fraud risk management
Publication Date: 2024.06.11 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US12008583B2 patent drawing
  • US12008583B2 patent drawing
  • US12008583B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of the present invention is directed to developing Autonomous Fraud Risk Management to identify emerging fraud trends in near real-time and mitigate risk by executing strategies to address fraud in a timely manner.