Autonomous Vehicle Handover Verification Using Operator Gaze Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for transitioning autonomous vehicle control to manual mode do not adequately ensure that the operator has acknowledged primary targets before handing over control, potentially leading to unsafe situations due to lack of awareness of critical objects in the environment.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes an object-detector and operator-monitor to classify targets, verify the operator's gaze direction, and use a controller to ensure the operator has looked at primary targets within a defined time before allowing manual mode takeover, with an alert device to notify the operator of missed targets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system performs verification that the operator has gazed at each primary target more recently than a primary time before executing handover, then operator awareness and safety are improved, but the transition time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator awarenessVSAvoidtransition time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification of operator gaze direction and target awareness before executing the handover from autonomous to manual mode. The controller monitors whether the operator has gazed at each primary target more recently than a primary time threshold, ensuring the operator is aware of critical objects before control transition occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the controller continuously monitors operator gaze direction using an operator monitor, compares it with target locations identified by an object detector, and provides feedback signals to indicate whether the operator has achieved sufficient awareness of primary targets before allowing handover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system verifies operator gaze at primary targets before handover, then safety is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional monitoring and verification components

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller performs multiple functions including monitoring operator gaze direction, identifying primary targets, verifying operator awareness, and controlling the handover process. The operator monitor and object detector are integrated into the existing autonomous vehicle control system, reducing the need for separate dedicated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the operator's own gaze direction data, captured by the operator monitor, to verify their awareness of targets. The controller self-verify whether the operator has gazed at primary targets by comparing gaze data with target locations, eliminating the need for external verification systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system requires operator gaze verification before manual mode takeover, then operator awareness is improved, but the productivity and response time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator awarenessVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system verifies operator awareness of primary targets rather than requiring verification for all detected objects. The controller identifies a subset of critical objects as primary targets and only requires the operator to have gazed at these specific targets, reducing the verification burden while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system adjusts the primary time threshold parameter dynamically or optimizes it to balance verification thoroughness with response time requirements. By tuning this temporal parameter, the system achieves adequate operator awareness verification without excessively prolonging the handover process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3597503B1Verification of vehicle operator awareness before transition from autonomous-mode to manual-mode
Publication Date: 2021.02.24 MOTIONAL AD LLC
  • EP3597503B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3597503B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3597503B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system (10) for operating a vehicle includes an object-detector (20), and operator-monitor (24), and a controller (30). The object-detector (20) is used to detect one or more targets (22) proximate to a host-vehicle (12), said host-vehicle (12) operable in an autonomous-mode (14) and a manual-mode (16). The operator-monitor (24) is used to detect a gaze-direction (26) of an operator (18) of the host-vehicle (12). The controller-circuit (30) is in communication with the object-detector (20) and the operator-monitor (24). The controller-circuit (30) is configured to determine a classification (42) of each target (22) detected by the object-detector (20). The classification (42) includes a primary-target (44) and an ignored-target (46). The controller-circuit (30) is further configured to determine that a hand-over (40) of operation of the host-vehicle (12) from the autonomous-mode (14) to the manual-mode (16) is recommended, perform a verification (60) that the operator (18) has gazed at each primary-target (44) more recently than a primary-time (62), and in response to the verification (60), execute the hand-over (40).