Autonomous Vehicle Safe State Transition via Escalated Haptic Warnings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous driving systems lack an effective warning escalation strategy to ensure driver safety and intervention in case the driver falls asleep or experiences a health issue while the vehicle is in autonomous mode, particularly during regular driving or temporary stationary situations.

Innovation Solution

A multi-step warning escalation strategy involving increasing optical, acoustic, and haptic warnings, followed by automatic braking to bring the vehicle to a safe state, including the use of intense haptic warnings and activation of the parking brake, to alert the driver and ensure safety of other road users.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the driver is repeatedly warned with optical and acoustic signals, then the driver may be awakened from sleep, but the warning system becomes more complex and energy-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidwarning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The warning system is segmented into multiple independent warning stages (optical warning, acoustic warning, haptic warning) that can be activated sequentially. Each warning type uses separate actuators and control logic, allowing the system to progress through increasingly intense warnings without requiring all components to operate simultaneously, thus managing complexity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by first activating less intrusive optical warnings before progressing to more intense acoustic and haptic warnings. This staged approach allows the driver to be awakened gently at first, with progressively stronger stimuli if needed, optimizing the balance between driver safety and system resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If intense haptic warnings are generated by abrupt braking, then the driver is strongly stimulated to wake up, but the vehicle's motion state changes and may affect other road users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver alertness assuranceVSAvoidimpact on other road users
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial braking force rather than full emergency braking when generating haptic warnings. The brake pressure is calibrated to provide sufficient haptic feedback to wake the driver while limiting the deceleration to levels that do not create hazardous situations for surrounding traffic, thus achieving driver stimulation without excessive harmful effects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The haptic warnings are generated periodically with brief intervals between successive braking pulses. This periodic application of mild braking stimuli allows the driver to be awakened through repeated gentlejolts rather than a single intense braking event, reducing the overall impact on vehicle motion and surrounding road users while maintaining effective driver alertness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If the vehicle is brought to a safe state by automatic braking, then the driver and other road users are protected, but the vehicle's normal operation is interrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assuranceVSAvoidvehicle operation continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system activates the parking brake in advance to hold the vehicle stationary after the warning sequence, creating a cushioning effect that prevents further motion. This prior cushioning action ensures the vehicle is secured in a safe state before any potential hazards can materialize, protecting both the driver and other road users while allowing the driver time to regain control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentEP2842112B1Method and apparatus for changing an autonomously travelling motor vehicle to a safe state
Publication Date: 2018.02.21 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • EP2842112B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2

AI summary

The invention relates to a method and an apparatus for changing a motor vehicle in an autonomous travel mode to a safe state when the driver of the motor vehicle is not able to monitor the autonomous travel mode and possibly to assume control of the motor vehicle (S2). In this case, a) the vehicle driver is warned (S2) using warning signals of increasing intensity; b) other road users in the area surrounding the motor vehicle are warned (S3) using optical and/or acoustic signals; c) the motor vehicle is braked and/or accelerated repeatedly, to be precise with an intensity such that at least parts of the body of the vehicle driver noticeably move in the direction of travel owing to inertia and also so briefly that the current travel speed of the motor vehicle changes relatively little (S4) during the repeated braking and/or acceleration; and d) the motor vehicle is brought to a standstill (S5) or is kept at a standstill (S6) by means of automatic braking in order to change the vehicle to a safe state.