Autonomous Vehicle HUD Curating Scenario Data for Safety Drivers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous vehicle systems face challenges in effectively presenting relevant autonomy-system-based information to safety drivers, leading to potential delays and inaccuracies in switching from autonomous to manual mode, and increase operational costs due to the need for safety engineers to relay complex data, which can overwhelm and distract safety drivers.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses data characterization to determine when to present scenario-based information to safety drivers through a heads-up display or speaker system, focusing on key data points such as scenario types, likelihood of contact, urgency levels, and disengagement needs, minimizing irrelevant information and reducing the reliance on safety engineers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive autonomy-system data is presented to safety drivers, then decision accuracy improves, but driver distraction and information overload increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments autonomy-system information into distinct categories (sensor data, system status, environmental factors) and presents only the relevant segments to the safety driver based on current operational context, rather than displaying all available data simultaneously. This reduces information overload while maintaining decision accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by tailoring the information presentation to specific driving scenarios and driver needs. Different types of autonomy-system data are selectively displayed based on the current operational context, ensuring that only locally relevant information is presented to the driver at any given moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If safety engineers relay complex autonomy data to drivers, then information completeness improves, but operational costs and response time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically processing and filtering autonomy-system data through onboard algorithms that identify and present only the most relevant information to the safety driver. This eliminates the need for safety engineers to manually relay data, reducing operational costs and response time while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical intermediary process (safety engineers relaying data) with an automated electronic information processing system. The onboard computing system directly analyzes autonomy-system data and presents curated information to the driver, substituting human mediation with automated mechanical/electronic processes that are faster and more efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If filtered autonomy-system information is presented to drivers, then driver focus improves, but decision-making speed may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver focusVSAvoiddecision-making speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing autonomy-system data in advance and organizing it into pre-curated formats before presentation to the driver. This preliminary organization of information reduces the cognitive load during critical decision moments, maintaining both driver focus and decision-making speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor driver response times and information processing patterns, continuously optimizing which autonomy-system data is presented and how it is formatted. This adaptive feedback ensures that filtered information maintains decision-making speed while improving driver focus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20210191394A1Systems and methods for presenting curated autonomy-system information of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2021.06.24 LYFT INC
  • US20210191394A1 patent drawing
  • US20210191394A1 patent drawing
  • US20210191394A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Examples disclosed herein may involve (i) obtaining data that characterizes a current scenario being faced by a vehicle that is operating in an autonomous mode while in a real-world environment, (ii) based on the obtained data that characterizes the current scenario being faced by the vehicle, determining that the current scenario being faced by the vehicle warrants presentation of scenario-based information to a user (e.g., an individual tasked with overseeing operation of the vehicle), and (iii) in response to the determining, presenting a given set of scenario-based information to the user via one or both of a heads-up-display (HUD) system or a speaker system of the vehicle.