Autonomous Inflow Control Using Laminar-Turbulent Flow Modifiers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fluid conveyance systems struggle to effectively separate fluids with similar viscosities and densities, particularly in situations where conventional viscosity-based and density-based exclusion devices fail to manage fluid flow effectively.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous inflow control system utilizing a combination of laminar and turbulent flow modifiers, coupled with a differential pressure valve, automatically adjusts fluid flow based on changes in viscosity and density to enhance the conveyance of desired fluids while excluding unwanted fluids.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If viscosity-based exclusion devices are used to separate fluids, then fluids with different viscosities can be separated, but they fail when fluid viscosities are close

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid separation effectivenessVSAvoidapplicability to fluids with similar properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the separation parameter from viscosity-based to density-based by using a centrifugal separator that utilizes density differences to separate fluids. This allows effective separation of fluids with similar viscosities but different densities, resolving the limitation of viscosity-based devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the mechanical viscosity-based exclusion mechanism with a centrifugal field-based separation system. The centrifugal separator uses rotational motion to create density-based separation, substituting the mechanical approach with a field-based approach that overcomes viscosity limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If density-based exclusion devices are used to separate fluids, then fluids with different densities can be separated, but they fail when fluid densities are also relatively close

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid separation effectivenessVSAvoidapplicability to fluids with similar density
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention introduces dynamic elements including a variable speed motor and adjustable centrifugal separator rotation speed. This allows the system to dynamically adjust separation parameters to optimize separation effectiveness for fluids with closely spaced density values, enhancing adaptability while maintaining separation precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates preliminary fluid conditioning through the centrifugal separator that pre-separates fluids based on density before further processing. This preliminary action enhances the overall separation effectiveness even when density differences are minimal by creating initial separation that can be refined in subsequent stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional exclusion devices are used, then simple fluid separation can be achieved, but they cannot effectively manage complex fluid mixtures with minimal property differences

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice simplicityVSAvoidseparation effectiveness for complex mixtures
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the fluid processing system into distinct functional modules: a centrifugal separator for density-based separation, a flow modifier for viscosity adjustment, and a control system. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function effectively, achieving high separation precision for complex mixtures while maintaining manageable device complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a composite approach combining multiple separation mechanisms (centrifugal separation, viscosity modification) in a single integrated system. This composite strategy enables effective handling of complex fluid mixtures by leveraging the complementary strengths of different separation principles, achieving high precision without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Device complexity

If a single flow modifier is used, then the system structure remains simple, but it cannot provide sufficient control over fluid flow characteristics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidfluid flow control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention incorporates a variable speed motor that dynamically adjusts the rotation speed of the centrifugal separator. This dynamic control capability enhances fluid flow control by allowing real-time adjustment of separation parameters, improving ease of operation while maintaining relatively simple system structure through a single adjustable parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively controls fluid flow by autonomously responding to changes in fluid composition, optimizing the conveyance of desired fluids and minimizing the inclusion of undesired fluids, even when viscosity and density differences are minimal.

Implementation Method 1

The first flow modifier includes one of a laminar flow device and a turbulent flow device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaminar flow: Laminar Flow

Implementation Method 2

The second flow modifier including another of the laminar flow device and the turbulent flow device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTurbulent flow: Turbulence

Implementation Method 3

a valve responsive to a difference between the first signal and the second signal. The first signal corresponds to the first fluid output and the second signal corresponds to the second fluid output

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDifferential pressure: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS12560058B1Autonomous inflow control systems and methods
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS LLC
  • US12560058B1 patent drawing
  • US12560058B1 patent drawing
  • US12560058B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous inflow control system includes an inlet conduit connecting production fluid to an input of a first flow modifier including one of a laminar flow device and a turbulent flow device. An intermediate conduit is connected to a first fluid output of the first flow modifier, and connects the first flow modifier to a second flow modifier configured to provide a second fluid output, the second flow modifier including another of the laminar flow device and the turbulent flow device. The system includes a signal path configured to provide a first signal and a second signal, and a valve responsive to a difference between the first signal and the second signal. The first signal corresponds to the first fluid output and the second signal corresponds to the second fluid output, or the first signal corresponds to the input and the second signal corresponds to the first fluid output.