Autonomous Item Fabrication With ML Feedback Refinement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Virtual marketplaces face inefficiencies in item lifecycle management, including delayed item conception, manufacture, listing, delivery, and feedback analysis, due to manual operations and limited real-time data analytics, which hinder vendors' ability to adapt to changing trends and behaviors.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous item generation system that uses machine learning models to automatically generate fabrication instructions and metadata for items, publish listings on virtual marketplaces, and continuously refine its models based on analytics data, enabling real-time adaptation to market trends without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If manual operations are used for item lifecycle management, then vendors can control each stage of the process, but delays occur at each stage including item conception, manufacture, listing, delivery, and feedback analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem lifecycle durationVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables autonomous item generation where the machine learning model automatically generates fabrication instructions, metadata, and listings without human intervention. The system self-updates by continuously learning from analytics data, eliminating the need for manual operations at each stage of the item lifecycle from conception to listing publication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with an automated machine learning-based system. The ML model substitutes human vendors' manual processes for generating item concepts, fabrication instructions, metadata, and listings, thereby eliminating delays associated with manual control and decision-making at each lifecycle stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If vendors manually perform operations to complete sales, then they maintain control over transactions and shipping, but significant time is lost in processing financial transactions, contracting for shipment, and other operational tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesales processing speedVSAvoidoperational task duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous system automatically handles all operational tasks including generating fabrication instructions, creating item listings with metadata, and publishing to virtual marketplaces without human intervention. This self-service capability eliminates the time vendors previously spent on processing sales operations manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model generates complete fabrication instructions and metadata in advance before items are manufactured or listed. By preparing all necessary operational data preliminarily, the system eliminates subsequent manual processing time for transactions and shipping arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If virtual marketplaces aggregate and analyze buyer feedback data, then comprehensive feedback information is collected, but computational and network resources required cause sporadic provision of feedback to vendors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeedback information availabilityVSAvoidfeedback analysis delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model continuously and automatically learns from analytics data describing buyer interactions with item listings. By performing feedback analysis preliminarily and continuously rather than periodically, the system eliminates delays in providing feedback information to vendors while maintaining comprehensive data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The manual or periodic feedback analysis process is replaced with an automated machine learning system that continuously processes analytics data. This substitution eliminates the computational and network resource bottlenecks that caused sporadic feedback provision, enabling real-time or near-real-time feedback availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If vendors manually designate and design item listing aspects, then they can customize each listing, but significant time is required to publish items at virtual marketplaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem listing publication speedVSAvoidlisting design time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model autonomously generates item metadata including descriptions, tags, and other listing aspects without human intervention. This self-service capability eliminates the time vendors spent manually designing and customizing each listing while maintaining comprehensive and optimized listing content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model performs multiple functions simultaneously: generating fabrication instructions, creating metadata, optimizing listing content, and publishing to marketplaces. This multi-functionality consolidates previously separate manual tasks into a single automated process, dramatically increasing listing publication speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230098794A1Autonomous Item Fabrication Utilizing a Trained Machine Learning Model
Publication Date: 2023.03.30 EBAY INC
  • US20230098794A1 patent drawing
  • US20230098794A1 patent drawing
  • US20230098794A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous item generation system implements a trained machine learning model configured to output fabrication instructions for generating an item and metadata describing the item, automatically and independent of user input. Fabrication instructions output by the machine learning model are transmitted to a fabrication device for generating the item. The autonomous item generation system generates a listing for the item based on the metadata output by the machine learning model and publishes the listing to a virtual marketplace. Analytics data describing feedback for the item listing is used to generate training data for the machine learning model. The training data is input to the machine learning model, which causes the machine learning model to refine at least one control parameter according to a loss function that penalizes negative differences between predicted and observed feedback data for the item. The machine learning model with the refined parameter(s) is then used by the autonomous item generation system to generate fabrication instructions and metadata for an additional item.