Autonomous Locker Access via Distributed PIN Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing locker systems face challenges in providing cost-effective, secure, and customer-convenient controlled access, particularly at entertainment venues, due to high attendant costs, accountability issues, and security risks associated with mechanical keys and centralized kiosk systems that lead to queueing and reliability problems during peak usage periods.

Innovation Solution

A kiosk system that assigns a unique personal identification number (PIN) to a securable device, allowing autonomous access without the need for continuous kiosk interaction, with the PIN being transmitted to and stored on the device, enabling access upon entry, and providing location information, while also allowing for offline operation in case of network failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a centralized kiosk system is used for locker access, then security control is improved, but queueing and user convenience deteriorate during peak usage periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity controlVSAvoidqueueing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized kiosk system is segmented by distributing access authority to individual lockers. Each locker contains a microprocessor and memory that can independently verify PIN codes, allowing users to access any available locker without queuing at a central kiosk. This segmentation maintains security through distributed verification while eliminating queueing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

PIN codes are pre-loaded into individual lockers before users arrive. When a user requests a locker, the system pre-generates and transmits the access code to the assigned locker, enabling immediate access upon arrival without requiring real-time kiosk interaction or queueing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If mechanical keys are used for locker access, then ease of operation is improved, but security and accountability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess convenienceVSAvoidsecurity and accountability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical key system is replaced with an electronic PIN code system. Users enter numeric codes on keypads at individual lockers, eliminating the need for physical keys. This substitution maintains ease of operation through simple code entry while dramatically improving security through automated logging, unique per-locker codes, and the ability to remotely reset or invalidate codes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service access where users independently enter PIN codes at lockers without requiring attendant intervention. The lockers autonomously verify codes and grant access, eliminating the need for key distribution and collection by staff while maintaining security through automated authentication and logging mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If electronic PIN systems are implemented, then security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single, standardized microprocessor-based control unit is designed to be universally compatible with all lockers in the system. This universal module handles PIN verification, access control, and logging functions across different locker types and locations, reducing overall system complexity through standardization while maintaining robust security features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

A centralized server acts as an intermediary between users and individual lockers. The server handles complex functions such as PIN generation, code distribution, and system-wide security management, while individual lockers perform only simple local verification. This intermediary approach centralizes complexity in a manageable location while keeping individual locker units simple and reliable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of operation

If attendants are used for key distribution, then customer service is improved, but operational cost deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer serviceVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed for complete self-service operation. Users interact with electronic kiosks or mobile devices to request lockers, receive their PIN codes, and access their assigned lockers independently. This eliminates the need for attendants to distribute keys or assist with locker access, dramatically reducing labor costs while maintaining convenient customer service through automated interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The human attendant role in key distribution is replaced with an automated electronic system. Computers and communication networks substitute for human workers in generating, distributing, and managing access codes, eliminating salary expenses while providing 24/7 automated customer service for locker requests and access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS8990110B2Autonomous operations of securable devices
Publication Date: 2015.03.24 BEST LOCKERS LLC
  • US8990110B2 patent drawing
  • US8990110B2 patent drawing
  • US8990110B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for assigning controlled access to a securable device may include a kiosk configured to receive a PIN and to collect payment from a user for rental of a securable device from among multiple securable devices. A lock unit associated with the securable device and in communication with the kiosk may be configured to receive the PIN from said kiosk. After receiving the PIN, the kiosk may be configured to operate autonomously with respect to the kiosk to enable the user to access the securable device in response to the user entering the PIN into the lock unit.