Autonomous Machine Noise-Aware Control for Worksite Productivity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Noise restrictions at worksites, which vary by time of day, day of the week, and year, limit the operation of machines, leading to decreased productivity as machines may need to be stopped during heightened noise restriction periods.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that use time-specific maximum noise limit data to control autonomous machines, switching between noise-optimized modes to maintain productivity while adhering to noise limits, by adjusting machine operation parameters such as engine power, transmission settings, and movement patterns to ensure sound output does not exceed allowed levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If machines operate at maximum productivity levels, then productivity is improved, but noise level increases and may exceed maximum noise limit levels

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidnoise level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts machine operation parameters based on real-time noise monitoring and predicted future noise levels. The autonomous machine modifies its operational characteristics (speed, power output, task execution rate) to maintain productivity while ensuring noise levels remain within predicted maximum limits for upcoming time periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters of the autonomous machine based on predicted noise levels. By adjusting parameters such as engine power, transmission settings, and movement patterns, the machine can operate at optimized productivity levels while keeping noise output within acceptable limits for different times of day.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If machines are stopped during heightened noise restriction time periods, then noise level is reduced to comply with restrictions, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise levelVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary noise level predictions for upcoming time periods and proactively adjusts machine operation parameters before noise restrictions become active. This allows the machine to continue operating during transition periods and maintain productivity while ensuring compliance with future noise limits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables continuous operation of autonomous machines by dynamically adjusting operational parameters rather than stopping work. The machine maintains continuous productive action while adapting its noise output to match predicted maximum noise limits across different time periods, eliminating idle time associated with traditional shutdown approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If different noise-optimized modes are used for different time periods, then noise compliance is improved, but machine operation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise complianceVSAvoidmachine operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous machine performs self-adjustment of operational parameters based on predicted noise levels and active restrictions. The machine autonomously selects and implements appropriate noise-optimized modes without requiring external intervention or complex manual reconfiguration, simplifying operation while maintaining compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses real-time noise level monitoring and prediction feedback to automatically adjust machine operation parameters. This closed-loop control enables the machine to adapt to different noise restrictions seamlessly, managing operational complexity through automated feedback-driven adjustments rather than manual mode switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11897448B2Systems, methods, and apparatuses for machine control at worksite based on noise level
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US11897448B2 patent drawing
  • US11897448B2 patent drawing
  • US11897448B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system, method, and apparatus can provide control signaling to control one or more autonomous machines during a plurality of predefined periods of time. Each of the one or more autonomous machines can be controlled according to a maximized productivity level for each task performed by the autonomous machine while at the same time generating sound during performance of the task at the maximized productivity level no louder than respective maximum noise limit levels specific for the plurality of predefined periods of time.