Autonomous Malware Patching via Sandbox Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems fail to reliably identify and patch vulnerabilities in software systems before they are exploited by malware, leading to delayed detection and defense against evolving malware threats.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing a sandbox environment, machine learning, and cybersecurity scoring to analyze vulnerabilities, develop patches, and deploy them autonomously, while continuously learning from emerging malware techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional vulnerability detection methods are used, then detection capability is limited, but response time is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability detection capabilityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively scanning for vulnerabilities, generating patches, and deploying them before malware can exploit the vulnerabilities. The automated patch management system continuously monitors for vulnerabilities and applies patches in advance, preventing the time delay between vulnerability discovery and patching that plagues traditional systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated vulnerability scanning, patch generation, and deployment without requiring manual security analyst intervention. The autonomous agents on endpoints automatically receive and apply patches, enabling the system to service itself and respond to vulnerabilities immediately without human response time delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual vulnerability analysis and patching is performed, then expertise is required, but processing speed is slow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevulnerability analysis accuracyVSAvoidpatching speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automating the entire vulnerability management lifecycle. Security agents on endpoints automatically scan for vulnerabilities, assess their severity, receive patches from the server, and apply them without human intervention. This eliminates the need for manual security expert analysis while maintaining high accuracy through automated vulnerability detection algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual security expert analysis with automated computational systems. Machine learning models and automated scanning tools substitute for human analysts, enabling rapid processing of vulnerabilities at scale without sacrificing detection accuracy. The automated patch generation and deployment systems replace manual patch management processes entirely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If comprehensive security scanning is performed, then security coverage is improved, but system performance is degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidsystem resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring security scanning intensity and frequency to specific endpoints, vulnerabilities, and risk levels. Rather than uniform comprehensive scanning of all systems, the automated patch management system prioritizes scanning and patching based on vulnerability severity, endpoint criticality, and risk assessment, optimizing resource usage while maintaining security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes parameters such as scan frequency, scan depth, and patch deployment timing based on system conditions, vulnerability criticality, and resource availability. This allows comprehensive security coverage when resources are available while reducing scanning intensity during peak system usage, balancing security needs with system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11568042B2System and methods for sandboxed malware analysis and automated patch development, deployment and validation
Publication Date: 2023.01.31 QOMPLX INC
  • US11568042B2 patent drawing
  • US11568042B2 patent drawing
  • US11568042B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and methods for sandboxed malware analysis and automated patch development, deployment and validation, comprising a business operating system, vulnerability scoring engine, binary translation engine, sandbox simulation engine, at least one network endpoint, at least one database, a network, and a combination of machine learning and vulnerability probing techniques, to analyze software, locate any vulnerabilities or malicious behavior, and attempt to patch and prevent undesired behavior from occurring, autonomously.