Autonomous Vehicle Mode Transition with Manual Input Override

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle control systems lack a seamless and safe transition mechanism between manual and autonomous modes, often leading to interference from manual inputs during autonomous operation.

Innovation Solution

A control system with switch interface logic and vehicle autonomy control logic that enables a transitional state where manual interactions are ignored, allowing drivers to switch to autonomous mode with a continuous action and disengage autonomously using designated inputs like brake taps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the vehicle control system allows manual control input during autonomous operation, then the driver can take over control quickly, but manual inputs may interfere with autonomous operation and cause safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of autonomous operationVSAvoiddriver ability to take over control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments the operational states into distinct modes (manual, autonomous, and transitional) with clearly defined boundaries. The transitional state acts as an intermediate segment that allows the system to move between manual and autonomous modes without direct interference, resolving the contradiction by creating a structured transition pathway that maintains safety while enabling driver takeover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The transitional state serves as an intermediary mechanism between manual and autonomous modes. During this intermediate state, the system temporarily ignores manual control inputs while maintaining autonomous operation, allowing the driver to perform deliberate actions (like continuous button presses) to initiate mode changes without causing unintended interference. This mediator resolves the contradiction by filtering out spurious inputs while preserving intentional driver commands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the vehicle switches directly between manual and autonomous modes, then the transition is quick and simple, but unintended manual inputs may cause accidental mode switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of mode transitionVSAvoidaccuracy of mode switching
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system requires the driver to perform a preliminary action (continuous button press or actuation of a switching mechanism) before the mode transition occurs. This preliminary action serves as a deliberate intent signal that distinguishes intentional mode changes from accidental inputs. The system maintains the transitional state until the preliminary action is completed, ensuring accuracy while enabling quick transitions once the driver's intent is confirmed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts its response to manual inputs based on the current operational state. In the transitional state, the system dynamically ignores manual control inputs while still monitoring for switching mechanism actuation. This dynamic behavior allows the system to maintain safety during transitions while remaining responsive to deliberate driver commands, resolving the contradiction between transition speed and switching accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the vehicle ignores manual control input during autonomous operation, then autonomous control is maintained, but the driver cannot quickly intervene when needed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability of autonomous operationVSAvoiddriver ability to intervene
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the mode-switching function from the regular control input channels. Instead of allowing manual control inputs to directly affect autonomous operation, the system separates the switching mechanism (button presses or dedicated switching mechanisms) from the control inputs. This extraction allows the driver to intervene in mode selection without interfering with autonomous control during operation, resolving the contradiction by creating dedicated pathways for mode changes versus control commands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The transitional state implements a preliminary anti-action by temporarily ignoring manual control inputs that would otherwise interfere with autonomous operation. This preemptive filtering of inputs protects the stability of autonomous operation while the system monitors for deliberate switching mechanism actuation. The preliminary anti-action resolves the contradiction by blocking harmful inputs while preserving the ability to initiate mode changes through dedicated switching mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentEP3865964B1Control system for autonomous-capable vehicles
Publication Date: 2023.11.22 UATC LLC
  • EP3865964B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3865964B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP3865964B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

An autonomous-capable vehicle which can be operated in a transitional state from manual vehicle operation to autonomous vehicle operation. In the transitional state, the vehicle operates autonomously and overrides manual interaction of the user. To maintain the transitional state, the driver performs a continuous action, such as providing a continuous interaction with a switching mechanism.