Autonomous Network Management via Deep Reinforcement Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless network management systems lack autonomous optimization capabilities, relying on manual intervention and failing to efficiently adapt to performance degradations across different radio access technologies and frequency bands, leading to suboptimal service delivery.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of deep reinforcement learning techniques using quantum state objects and autoencoders to analyze network performance data, select optimal configuration changes, and apply actions autonomously, optimizing network resources without user input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual intervention is used for network management, then system complexity is reduced, but network optimization capability and adaptability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork optimization capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The network management system implements self-service through autonomous agents that automatically monitor network performance, detect degradations, and apply optimizations without manual intervention. The system uses self-learning algorithms that continuously improve their optimization capabilities by learning from historical network data and outcomes, enabling the system to manage itself while adapting to changing network conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes network parameters such as radio access technology configurations, frequency band allocations, and antenna settings based on real-time performance monitoring. By automatically adjusting these parameters in response to detected service degradations, the system achieves high adaptability while the automated parameter management reduces the perceived complexity for operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If autonomous optimization is implemented, then network performance and adaptability improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork performanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous network management system is segmented into multiple specialized agents, each responsible for specific network functions such as performance monitoring, anomaly detection, optimization decision-making, and configuration management. This modular architecture improves network performance through specialized expertise in each domain while reducing overall system complexity by distributing functions across independent, manageable components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary components including machine learning models that act as mediators between raw network data and optimization decisions, and configuration management layers that mediate between optimization commands and actual network settings. These intermediaries simplify the complexity by providing abstraction layers that translate complex autonomous operations into manageable processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If deep reinforcement learning is used for autonomous management, then adaptability and optimization improve, but computational complexity and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous optimization capabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-training reinforcement learning models using historical network data and simulated scenarios before deploying them to production environments. This offline pre-training reduces the computational complexity during real-time operations, as the models have already learned optimal strategies in advance and only require inference rather than full training computations when making actual optimization decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The deep reinforcement learning system implements partial action by focusing computational resources on the most critical network parameters and performance metrics that have the greatest impact on service quality. Rather than optimizing all possible network parameters simultaneously, the system identifies and prioritizes key optimization targets, reducing computational complexity while maintaining effective autonomous optimization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11985527B2Systems and methods for autonomous network management using deep reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US11985527B2 patent drawing
  • US11985527B2 patent drawing
  • US11985527B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system described herein may provide a technique for analyzing metrics, parameters, attributes, and/or other information associated with networks or other devices or systems associated with high-dimensional data in order to determine potential configuration changes that may be made to such networks or other devices or systems in order to optimize and/or otherwise enhance the operation of such networks or other devices or systems. Multiple autoencoders associated with multiple dimensions may be used to calculate reconstruction errors or other features of data (e.g., metrics, parameters, etc.) that may be used to define operating or performance states of the network. Operating or performance states of network components may be mapped to quantum state objects (“QSOs”) for analysis using artificial intelligence and/or machine learning techniques or other suitable techniques.