Autonomous Override Safety in Self-Driving Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In self-driving vehicles, there is a need for a reliable mechanism to safely shut down the vehicle in case of malfunctions or incorrect operations, such as during ride-sharing scenarios or when the vehicle is performing an unexpected action, to ensure passenger safety.

Innovation Solution

An emergency shut-down system is implemented, featuring an override switch that sends a 'bios' or lower-level command to the vehicle control unit, alerting nearby vehicles and pulling over to a complete stop while unlocking doors, utilizing a combination of sensors and communication systems to determine a safe stop location and coordinate with other vehicles for safe navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If an autonomous vehicle system operates with high-level control signals, then the vehicle can perform complex functions and operations, but the system becomes vulnerable to software failures and incorrect operations that compromise safety

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle control capabilityVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into hierarchical levels with a BIOS layer providing fundamental safety functions separate from upper-level autonomous driving software. This segmentation isolates critical safety functions from potential software failures in higher-level control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An emergency shutdown switch acts as an intermediary mechanism that bypasses normal control software hierarchies. When activated, it directly triggers safety responses through lower-level control pathways, serving as a mediator between passenger intent and vehicle safety systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If an emergency shutdown mechanism is implemented, then passenger safety is improved, but the system complexity increases due to additional switches and communication protocols

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The emergency shutdown switch integrates multiple functions into a single device: it activates emergency braking, triggers horn alerts, activates hazard lights, and unlocks doors. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed while maintaining comprehensive safety capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically executes a coordinated safety response sequence when the emergency switch is activated, without requiring manual intervention for each individual safety function. The vehicle's control systems self-manage the emergency response protocol.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the vehicle immediately stops upon emergency activation, then passenger safety is prioritized, but the risk of collision with nearby vehicles increases without coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system activates warning signals (horn, hazard lights) and communicates emergency status to surrounding vehicles before and during the stopping process. This preliminary alerting gives other drivers time to react and avoid collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors the vehicle's stopping process and surrounding environment, adjusting the shutdown sequence based on real-time conditions. Communication with other vehicles provides feedback about their responses, allowing dynamic adjustment of safety maneuvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10466061B2Autonomous override safety
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 NIO TECH ANHUI CO LTD
  • US10466061B2 patent drawing
  • US10466061B2 patent drawing
  • US10466061B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems of an electrical vehicle and the operations thereof are provided. As vehicles become self-driven, safety should be improved. In the rare occurrence that a vehicle is performing an incorrect function or in an incorrect manner, the passengers need to be able to shut down the car and evacuate the vehicle in a safe manner. Highlighted by this is ride sharing vehicle that picks random passengers up. Inside the vehicle would be an override switch. When initiated, the override switch would send a lower level command to the vehicle control unit overriding any upper level signals, alert any near cars of the issue and immediately pull over and bring to a complete stop (unlocking all doors as well) the vehicle. This could optionally be coupled with one or more mechanical/electrical shut down/disconnect mechanisms.