Autonomous Parking Allocation Using Event-Time Relocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems struggle to efficiently manage parking for autonomous transports, particularly in congested areas, as they lack the ability to coordinate parking procedures based on passenger destinations, event durations, and user preferences.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a decentralized database, such as a blockchain, to manage parking by determining optimal parking spaces based on event durations, user profiles, and available spaces, allowing autonomous transports to move between initial and final spaces as needed, and assigning priority parking through smart contracts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous transports park at initial spaces without coordination, then parking simplicity is maintained, but parking efficiency and space utilization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A server acts as an intermediary between autonomous transports and parking spaces. The server receives location information from transports, determines optimal parking spaces based on destination and event duration, and coordinates movements. This mediator enables efficient parking coordination without requiring complex direct communication between all transports and all spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system determines optimal parking spaces in advance before transports arrive. By pre-calculating the best parking locations based on predicted event durations and destinations, the system eliminates on-site searching and coordination delays, improving overall parking efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If transports park closer to event locations, then passenger convenience is improved, but parking space availability deteriorates due to congestion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger convenienceVSAvoidavailable parking spaces
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The parking assignment is dynamic rather than static. Transports may be assigned to initial parking spaces away from event locations, then dynamically relocated to closer spaces when event duration predictions indicate availability. This dynamic reassignment optimizes both space utilization and passenger convenience throughout the event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The parking process is segmented into multiple phases: initial parking at less congested areas, monitoring of event duration and space availability, and subsequent relocation to optimal closer spaces. This segmentation allows transports to secure parking efficiently while still achieving convenient final positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If multiple transports are assigned to the same destination, then destination service quality is improved, but parking space sufficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedestination service qualityVSAvoidparking space capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system adds the time dimension to parking space allocation. Instead of only considering spatial availability, it factors in event duration predictions and temporal patterns of space availability. This allows multiple transports bound for the same destination to be accommodated by assigning them to different time windows and parking spaces, effectively expanding capacity beyond physical constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If real-time parking monitoring is implemented, then parking optimization is improved, but information processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparking optimizationVSAvoiddata processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential information needed for parking optimization: transport location, destination, and predicted event duration. By filtering out unnecessary data and focusing on these key parameters, the system achieves effective real-time monitoring and optimization without being overwhelmed by excessive information processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250259544A1Parking monitoring and assistance for transports
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US20250259544A1 patent drawing
  • US20250259544A1 patent drawing
  • US20250259544A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example operation may include one or more of parking a transport in an initial space, determining an average time of an event attended by at least one occupant associated with the transport, moving the transport to at least one other space when an elapsed time of the event is less than the average time and when the at least one other space is available and closer to an event location than the initial space, and moving the transport to a final space when the event is completed, and the final space is a location of a device associated with the at least one occupant.