Autonomous Driving Path Correction for Narrow Obstacle Passages

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous driving devices face challenges in navigating through passages with stationary or movable obstacles, including other autonomous driving devices, due to limited sensor range and lack of effective path correction mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

The autonomous driving device employs sensors like image and LiDAR to detect obstacles, determines the need for path crossing, calculates time to collision, identifies other devices using database information, and adjusts driving paths based on rules and sensor configurations to avoid or navigate around obstacles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the autonomous driving device follows the initially determined movement path, then it maintains simple navigation logic, but it cannot pass through narrow passages when obstacles are present

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAbility to navigate around obstaclesVSAvoidPath correction mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic path correction by continuously monitoring obstacle positions and adjusting the movement path in real-time. The processor calculates corrected paths based on current sensor data, transforming the static navigation system into a dynamic one that adapts to changing environmental conditions, enabling the device to navigate around obstacles while maintaining manageable complexity through algorithmic flexibility rather than mechanical complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes navigation parameters dynamically by calculating alternative paths when obstacles are detected. The processor modifies path parameters such as position, orientation, and timing based on obstacle characteristics and passage geometry, allowing the device to adapt its navigation behavior without requiring complex mechanical reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If the autonomous driving device uses basic obstacle detection, then the device structure remains simple, but it cannot effectively distinguish between different types of obstacles like stationary objects and other autonomous devices

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveObstacle identification accuracyVSAvoidSensor and processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces communication signals as an intermediary layer between basic sensor detection and obstacle classification. The sensor unit detects obstacles and receives communication signals from other autonomous devices, which serve as mediators carrying identification information. This intermediary mechanism enables accurate distinction between different obstacle types without requiring complex sensor arrays, as the communication signals provide additional contextual information for classification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical or hardware-based obstacle classification systems with software-based processing of communication signals. Instead of using multiple specialized sensors or complex mechanical identification systems, the processor analyzes communication signals to identify obstacle types, substituting a simpler signal-processing approach for what would otherwise require more complex detection hardware

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If the autonomous driving device does not calculate time to collision, then the processing load remains low, but it cannot determine appropriate crossing timing when paths intersect

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNavigation efficiencyVSAvoidProcessing power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial calculation of time to collision by computing it only when path intersection with obstacles is detected, rather than continuously calculating for all scenarios. This selective computation approach provides sufficient processing power for critical decision-making moments while avoiding unnecessary processing load during normal navigation, thereby improving navigation efficiency without excessive power consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables safe and efficient navigation around obstacles, including other autonomous devices, by optimizing driving paths and speeds, ensuring smooth passage through narrow spaces and providing alerts or alternative routes when necessary.

Implementation Method 1

The at least one sensor may include at least one of: an image sensor or a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Implementation Method 2

The at least one sensor may include at least one of: an image sensor or a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS20260070582A1Autonomous driving device and driving control method thereof
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20260070582A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070582A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070582A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous driving device and a driving control method thereof are provided. The autonomous driving device includes at least one sensor, a processor, and storage including a database. The processor is configured to detect, using the at least one sensor, an obstacle that is present on a passage in a first driving path, of the first autonomous driving device, to a destination; determine whether there is a need for the first autonomous driving device to cross paths with the obstacle to pass through the passage; determine a time to collision by the first autonomous driving device with the obstacle; determine whether the obstacle is a second autonomous driving device; identify a driving rule corresponding to the second autonomous driving device; determine, based on the driving rule, a second driving path for passing through the passage; and control the first autonomous driving device to drive on the passage along the second driving path.