Autonomous Vehicle Pullover Relocation for Passenger Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles often pullover at inconvenient locations due to external obstacles, causing difficulty for passengers to enter or exit, and existing systems fail to consider passenger needs when changing pullover locations, leading to delays and inconvenience.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows passengers to request a new pullover location through a computing device, with the vehicle's computing devices determining feasibility and selecting a new location based on factors like roadway features and potential pullover spots, and controlling the vehicle to move to the new location.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the autonomous vehicle stops at the initially selected pullover location, then the vehicle follows the planned route efficiently, but the passenger may experience inconvenience due to external obstacles such as puddles, crowds, or objects blocking access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute efficiencyVSAvoidpassenger convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the pullover location based on real-time conditions. The computing device monitors external obstacles and automatically determines whether to move the vehicle to an alternative location, making the pullover location flexible rather than fixed, thus resolving the contradiction between route efficiency and passenger convenience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the environment around the pullover location using sensors and computing devices. When obstacles are detected, the system receives feedback about the inconvenient conditions and responds by selecting an alternative pullover location, thereby maintaining passenger convenience while minimizing disruption to the overall route

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the autonomous vehicle moves to a new pullover location due to external obstacles, then passenger convenience is improved, but the vehicle requires additional time for location changes and system processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger convenienceVSAvoidtime for location change
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively monitoring for obstacles before the vehicle arrives at the pullover location. The computing device continuously assesses environmental conditions and prepares alternative locations in advance, so when obstacles are detected, the transition to a new location can occur quickly without significant delays

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting the pullover location based on detected obstacles. By modifying the location parameters dynamically and selecting from pre-identified alternative locations, the system minimizes the time required for location changes while maintaining passenger convenience

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides real-time pullover location change capability, then passenger convenience and ridership are enhanced, but the system complexity increases due to additional sensors, computing requirements, and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation flexibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by integrating the obstacle detection and location change functionality into the existing autonomous vehicle control architecture. The computing device performs multiple functions including route planning, obstacle detection, and pullover location management, reducing the need for separate dedicated systems and thereby limiting the increase in overall system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service by enabling the autonomous vehicle to automatically detect obstacles, determine inconvenient pullover locations, and select alternative locations without requiring constant human intervention. The computing device autonomously processes sensor data and makes decisions about location changes, reducing the operational complexity despite the enhanced adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250346259A1Pullover location changes for autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2025.11.13 WAYMO LLC
  • US20250346259A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346259A1 patent drawing
  • US20250346259A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure provide for pullover location changes for autonomous vehicles. For instance, an autonomous vehicle may be controlled in an autonomous driving mode to stop at a pullover location. Whether a passenger should be provided with an option to trigger the autonomous vehicle to move from the pullover location to a new pullover location may be determined. While the vehicle is stopped at the pullover location and based on the determination, a signal may be sent in order to provide the option to the passenger, and while the vehicle is stopped at the pullover location, an indication that the passenger has selected the option is received. In response to receiving the indication, the vehicle may be controlled in the autonomous driving mode to a new pullover location.