Autonomous Resource Planning System for Employee Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional resource management methods struggle to optimize resource utilization and allocate the most suitable resources for tasks, often leading to skills gaps and project delays due to inadequate consideration of employee skills and availability, especially in large organizations.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous resource planning system that computes a compound performance index score for employees based on static and recent performance metrics, availability, and workload, allocating tasks to the highest-ranked employees with a maximum index of fit score.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional resource management methods are used, then resource allocation is simple and manual, but resource utilization efficiency deteriorates and project delays occur due to inadequate consideration of employee skills and availability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidresource planning system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual resource allocation methods with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to compute compound performance index scores. The system automatically evaluates employee skills, availability, and performance metrics to generate optimal resource allocation recommendations, eliminating the need for manual assessment and significantly improving resource utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a compound performance index score that combines multiple parameters including employee skills, availability, historical performance, and current workload. By changing from simple manual allocation to a multi-parameter automated evaluation system, the patent resolves the contradiction between allocation simplicity and utilization efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If manual resource allocation is used, then decision-making is subjective and prone to error, but the system remains simple and easy to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation accuracyVSAvoidresource planning operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system continuously monitors employee performance, updates performance indices, and recalculates optimal allocations. This automated feedback loop eliminates subjective human judgment and provides precise, data-driven allocation decisions while maintaining ease of operation through automatic updates and recommendations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically computing performance indices, evaluating resource allocation options, and generating recommendations without requiring manual intervention. This maintains operational simplicity while dramatically improving allocation accuracy through objective, algorithm-based decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If employees are assigned based on availability only, then allocation is quick and simple, but skills gaps magnify project delays and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproject completion efficiencyVSAvoidproject delay time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary evaluation of employee skills and performance before allocation decisions are made. By pre-computing performance indices and maintaining updated skill profiles, the system ensures that when allocation decisions are needed, the most suitable employees are identified quickly, preventing skills gaps from causing project delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive employee evaluation is performed, then resource allocation accuracy improves, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemployee evaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary computations by pre-establishing performance indices and maintaining updated employee profiles with skills and historical performance data. This allows the system to conduct comprehensive evaluations quickly when allocation decisions are needed, as the foundational data is already processed and organized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms complex employee evaluation data into a simplified compound performance index score that combines multiple factors into a single comparable metric. This parameter transformation maintains evaluation accuracy while enabling rapid comparison and decision-making, reducing processing time without sacrificing comprehensiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240095624A1Device, system, and method of autonomous resource planning
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 GRENE ROBOTICS (INDIA) PTE LTD
  • US20240095624A1 patent drawing
  • US20240095624A1 patent drawing
  • US20240095624A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is an autonomous resource planning device (104) that includes a processing circuitry (208) that is configured to receive one or more inputs representing static scores associated with one or more employees, compute a base score associated with each employee of one or more employees, allocate recent performance index score for each employee of one or more employees, generate a compound performance index score based on computing the base score and the recent performance index score of the one or more employees with time weight, generate index of fit score based on employee of one or more employees availability and workload details, and allocate highest ranked resource to a corresponding employee of the one or more employees with maximum index of fit score. The present disclosure also relates to a system (100) and a method (300) for managing resources.