Autonomous Vehicle Risk Prediction With Transformer Scene Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle systems face challenges in efficiently processing extensive, variable, and diverse datasets for accurate risk assessment and control, requiring significant computational power and storage, and are time-consuming due to the complexity of handling multimodal data.

Innovation Solution

A method and system utilizing a transformer-based risk prediction model trained with a limited dataset, leveraging self-attention layers to capture long-range dependencies and interpret multimodal data directly, enabling real-time risk assessment and vehicle control without explicit feature extraction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional autonomous vehicle systems process extensive multimodal datasets, then measurement precision of risk assessment is improved, but device complexity and computational power requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the explicit feature extraction step from the traditional pipeline. The transformer model directly processes raw multimodal sensor data (images, point clouds, audio) without requiring separate feature extraction modules, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining risk assessment accuracy through the self-attention mechanism's ability to capture relevant features automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The transformer-based risk prediction model serves multiple functions simultaneously: it performs feature extraction, risk prediction, and temporal-spatial relationship modeling within a single unified architecture. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining comprehensive risk assessment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If traditional systems handle complex multimodal data processing, then risk assessment accuracy is improved, but processing time increases making the system time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk prediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical-style sequential processing pipelines with a parallel transformer architecture. The self-attention mechanism enables simultaneous processing of multiple data modalities and temporal steps, substituting the sequential mechanical processing with a parallel computational approach that maintains accuracy while reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The transformer model performs preliminary attention-weighted processing of all input data simultaneously, identifying and focusing on critical features before final risk prediction. This preliminary action of selective attention allows the system to process extensive multimodal data efficiently by prioritizing relevant information, thereby reducing overall processing time while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If extensive datasets are processed for training, then risk prediction accuracy is improved, but computational power and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidcomputational power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the training approach by using the transformer model's self-attention mechanism to learn from data more efficiently. The model achieves high accuracy with limited training data by dynamically weighting the importance of different training examples and features, reducing the need for extensive datasets and the associated computational power and storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If explicit feature extraction is performed before risk prediction, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk prediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing pipeline complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the separate explicit feature extraction module from the processing pipeline. The transformer model's self-attention mechanism inherently performs feature extraction by dynamically weighting and combining raw input features from multiple modalities, eliminating the need for separate extraction steps and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the feature extraction and risk prediction functions into a single unified transformer model. Instead of having separate modules for feature extraction and prediction, the model performs both functions simultaneously through its attention mechanisms, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining or improving prediction accuracy through integrated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12371062B1Method and system for autonomous vehicle control
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 GATIK AI INC
  • US12371062B1 patent drawing
  • US12371062B1 patent drawing
  • US12371062B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining scene risk for an autonomous vehicle includes receiving scene data, predicting risk scores using a trained risk prediction model, determining an appropriate autonomous vehicle behavior based on these risk scores, and controlling the vehicle accordingly. In some implementations, the method includes training the risk prediction model by generating initial risk scores from a labeled training dataset, learning an intermediate model from these scores, and training the risk prediction model using multimodal training data and secondary risk scores.