Autonomous Vehicle Routing With Depart Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in navigating dynamic environments due to outdated map data and lack of real-time information about events and conditions affecting travel routes, leading to inefficiencies and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses dynamic constraint data, including depart constraints, to manage navigation by defining permissible and exclusion areas based on geographic identifiers and application types, allowing autonomous vehicles to adjust routes in real-time and avoid hazardous conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If map data is used for navigation, then autonomous vehicles can determine travel routes, but the map data is outdated and does not reflect changing availability of travel ways

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidreal-time route information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static map data to dynamic constraint data that updates in real-time. Constraint data includes geographic identifiers and application types that change based on current conditions such as road closures, construction, and events, allowing the navigation system to reflect the most current state of travel ways without requiring continuous map updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-defines constraint data with geographic identifiers and application types for various conditions (road closures, construction zones, events) before they occur or as they are reported. This allows the navigation system to quickly apply appropriate constraints when conditions change, rather than waiting for map data to be updated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional routing constraints are applied, then vehicles avoid exclusion areas, but vehicles may become stranded if already inside the excluded area when constraints are imposed

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidroute flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The depart constraint applies different rules to different situations: vehicles outside the geographic area cannot enter, but vehicles already inside the area when the constraint is imposed are permitted to exit. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by applying strict avoidance to new routes while providing flexibility for vehicles already in the area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of constraint application from binary (always forbid) to conditional (forbid with exception). The depart constraint modifies the default forbid behavior by adding a time-based condition: if the vehicle is inside the area when the constraint is imposed, the constraint allows exit rather than forcing immediate termination or rerouting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If real-time constraint data is implemented, then vehicles can dynamically adjust routes, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic route adjustmentVSAvoidconstraint data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The constraint data is segmented into discrete geographic identifiers (polygons, circles, rectangles) with associated application types. This segmentation allows the system to process constraints as individual, manageable units rather than continuous complex data, reducing computational burden while maintaining real-time capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The constraint data structure with geographic identifiers and application types serves multiple functions: it defines exclusion areas, specifies depart constraints, provides real-time updates, and works across different navigation scenarios. This universal structure reduces overall system complexity by using a single data format for multiple purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11287818B2Depart constraints implementation in autonomous vehicle routing
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 AURORA OPERATIONS INC
  • US11287818B2 patent drawing
  • US11287818B2 patent drawing
  • US11287818B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of controlling navigation of autonomous vehicles includes accessing map data descriptive of the identity and location of different travel ways within a surrounding environment of an autonomous vehicle and accessing constraint data descriptive of one or more geographic areas or geographic identifiers, within the map data, for which associated navigational constraints are defined. The constraint data includes a depart constraint that specifies an area that an autonomous vehicle may not enter but may exit if inside the area when the depart constraint is imposed, thereby preventing the autonomous vehicle from being trapped in a forbidden area even though the autonomous vehicle may safely complete its route. A travel route is determined for the autonomous vehicle based at least in part on the map data evaluated relative to the constraint data including the depart constraint, and motion of the autonomous vehicle is controlled based on the determined travel route.