Autonomous Row-Crop Robot for In-Season Fertilizer Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current agricultural technologies face inefficiencies in fertilizer application, particularly in-season management tasks, due to the limitations of conventional tractor-drawn equipment and the loss of nutrients through various processes, leading to uneven nutrient distribution and increased costs for farmers.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous vehicle platform capable of navigating between planted rows, equipped with a seeding structure, navigation module, and microprocessor, which allows for autonomous operation in performing tasks such as sampling and seeding cover crops, while alerting operators to obstacles, thereby optimizing fertilizer application and reducing nutrient loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional tractor-drawn equipment is used for fertilizer application, then equipment availability and simplicity are maintained, but the ability to perform in-season management tasks is limited due to crop height restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to perform in-season management tasksVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the field into manageable rows and processes them sequentially using an autonomous vehicle that navigates between rows. This segmentation allows the system to perform in-season management tasks on tall crops without requiring complex high-clearance equipment across the entire field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicle performs fertilizer application and monitoring tasks independently without human intervention. The system self-navigates, self-monitors for obstacles, and self-adjusts operation parameters, eliminating the need for complex operator-controlled high-clearance equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If fertilizer is applied to the soil surface for quick availability, then nutrient accessibility is improved, but loss through volatilization and runoff increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenutrient availabilityVSAvoidfertilizer loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs soil sampling and nutrient analysis before fertilizer application to determine precise application rates and timing. This preliminary assessment ensures fertilizer is applied only when and where needed, reducing waste from runoff and volatilization while maintaining nutrient availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vehicle continuously monitors field conditions and crop nutrient status, using this feedback to adjust fertilizer application rates in real-time. This closed-loop control optimizes nutrient availability while minimizing losses through volatilization and runoff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If uniform fertilizer application is used to ensure adequate nutrient supply, then crop growth requirements are met, but nutrient distribution efficiency decreases and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadequate nutrient supplyVSAvoidapplication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies fertilizer at varying rates based on local soil nutrient status and crop needs identified through sampling and monitoring. This localized approach ensures adequate nutrient supply in deficient areas while avoiding over-application in sufficient areas, improving efficiency and reducing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts fertilizer application parameters (rate, timing, location) based on real-time field conditions and crop responses. This parameter optimization ensures reliable nutrient supply while maximizing application efficiency and minimizing waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If high-clearance systems are used to access tall crops, then in-season management capability is improved, but equipment complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to tall cropsVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle independently navigates and operates between crop rows, using sensors and navigation systems to access tall crops without requiring complex mechanical high-clearance structures. The system's intelligence compensates for the simpler mechanical design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical high-clearance equipment with an autonomous navigation and sensing system that can operate effectively among tall crops. The mechanical simplicity is compensated by electronic and software complexity in the autonomous control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP3827654A1Agricultural robot for performing multiple functions in argicultural systems
Publication Date: 2021.06.02 ROWBOT SYSTEMS LLC
  • EP3827654A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3827654A1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3827654A1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

An agricultural robot configured to perform one or more in-season management tasks on an agricultural field while autonomously navigating between adjacent rows of planted crops, based at least in part on an increased data collection range of one or more aerial navigation sensors coupled to a mast extending generally upward, away from a surface of the agricultural field.