Autonomous Safety Rider Control for Driverless Vehicle Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ensuring autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicles meet safety standards during testing without human intervention, as they operate in various environments.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous safety rider system that can control the brakes, throttle, and/or steering of the vehicle via drive-by-wire or physical actuators, monitoring sensors and engaging actuators to maintain safety parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous vehicles are deployed without safety riders, then operational efficiency and cost are improved, but safety and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The safety rider drone acts as an intermediary between the autonomous vehicle and the environment, providing aerial monitoring and hazard detection capabilities without requiring physical contact with the vehicle. The drone serves as a mediator that enhances safety while maintaining the autonomy of the vehicle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical presence of a human safety rider with an autonomous aerial drone system equipped with sensors and communication devices. This substitution eliminates the need for physical infrastructure and human intervention while maintaining safety monitoring functions through electronic and optical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If a human safety rider is used, then safety monitoring is improved, but operational cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety rider drone operates autonomously without requiring human pilots or operators. It self-navigates, self-monitors the vehicle, and self-communicates hazard information to the vehicle's control system, eliminating the need for human safety riders and reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The drone is designed to perform multiple functions including hazard detection, navigation assistance, and communication relay, making it a universal safety system that can monitor various aspects of vehicle operation with a single device rather than requiring multiple specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional safety systems are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to new hazards deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidhazard detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The safety rider drone system is designed with dynamic adaptability, allowing it to adjust its monitoring parameters, sensor configurations, and response protocols based on the specific vehicle type, environment, and detected hazards. This dynamic nature enables the system to adapt to new hazards while maintaining relatively simple implementation through software updates rather than hardware redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4196859B1Autonomous safety rider
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 AUTONOMOUS SOLUTIONS INC
  • EP4196859B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4196859B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4196859B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

System and methods are disclosed that provide an autonomous safety rider system for an autonomous vehicle. The autonomous safety rider system, for example, may allow the autonomous vehicle to undergo various on road tests without having a human safety rider. The autonomous safety rider system may be able to control the brakes, throttle, and/or steering of the autonomous vehicle such as, for example, via a drive by wire (or CAN) interface or via one or more physical actuators that physically engage with the brakes, throttle, and/or steering.