Autonomous Server Agents for Distributed IT Orchestration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managing distributed IT networks with disparate servers and varying security threats is labor-intensive and inefficient, as existing systems lack centralized management tools for easy access, task execution, and reliable security monitoring across multiple servers.

Innovation Solution

A central cloud-based management system with autonomous agents deployed on each server, enabling rapid script distribution, task execution, and security threat detection, allowing for secure communication and autonomous operation even without continuous connectivity to the supervisory server.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a centralized management system is implemented to manage distributed servers, then ease of operation and task execution improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of access to serversVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

An autonomous agent is introduced as an intermediary component installed on each server. This agent acts as a local representative that handles management tasks locally while communicating with the centralized management system, thereby simplifying remote operations without requiring direct complex interactions between the central system and each individual server.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The management system is segmented into a centralized management system component and distributed autonomous agent components. Each server runs its own autonomous agent that can independently execute tasks locally, while the centralized system provides high-level coordination. This segmentation distributes system complexity across multiple independent units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If autonomous agents are deployed on each server for independent operation, then reliability improves through autonomous execution, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of task executionVSAvoidagent deployment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A universal autonomous agent design is implemented that can be deployed across diverse server environments (different operating systems, configurations, and locations). The agent provides multi-functional capabilities including task execution, security monitoring, and communication with the centralized system, thereby achieving reliable autonomous operation without requiring custom solutions for each server.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous agent is designed to adapt to different server environments by changing its operational parameters and configuration based on the local server's characteristics, such as operating system type, available resources, and security requirements. This allows the same agent architecture to reliably operate across heterogeneous servers without increasing fundamental complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If security monitoring is enhanced across the network, then security detection capability improves, but use of energy and computational resources increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity threat detectionVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous agent implements selective security monitoring that focuses computational resources on detecting specific security threats and anomalies rather than continuously analyzing all system activities. The agent prioritizes monitoring critical security parameters and only intensifies analysis when potential threats are detected, thereby improving detection capability while conserving computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The security monitoring system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the autonomous agent continuously monitors system behavior, compares it against known security patterns, and adjusts its monitoring intensity based on detected anomalies. When normal operation is detected, monitoring operates at low intensity; when suspicious activity is detected, the agent intensifies monitoring locally before alerting the centralized system, optimizing resource usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240364576A1Autonomous server agents
Publication Date: 2024.10.31 JUMPCLOUD INC
  • US20240364576A1 patent drawing
  • US20240364576A1 patent drawing
  • US20240364576A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices are described for orchestrating server management in a modern IT network. The described techniques may be implemented to manage any number of networked severs, whether local, remote, or both. Server orchestration may leverage a central, cloud-based management system and/or one or more autonomous agents installed on servers with the network. The autonomous agents may each be registered with the supervisory server and may have awareness of one another.