Autonomous Supply Chain Management with Dynamic Asset Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current supply and distribution chain management systems are inefficient due to excessive human intervention, high costs, and inability to optimize end-to-end transit operations, leading to inventory delays and inaccuracies in tracking and responding to changing demands.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous supply and distribution chain system that utilizes a centralized database for asset compatibility, artificial intelligence to reconfigure assets, and dynamic route optimization based on real-time data from sensors, enabling flexible adjustments to transit operations and inventory location identification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If expensive and labor-intensive tracking systems are used to identify and locate goods, then measurement precision of inventory location is improved, but device complexity and loss of time increase due to excessive human intervention and maintenance requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory location tracking accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service tracking where goods themselves carry identification elements (RFID tags, QR codes) that automatically transmit location data without requiring human operators to manually track or update inventory positions. The tracking system operates autonomously, eliminating the need for labor-intensive manual monitoring while maintaining accurate real-time location data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical tracking methods with automated electronic and optical systems. RFID readers, barcode scanners, and sensors automatically detect and record inventory movements, substituting the need for human operators to physically track goods. This electronic substitution maintains measurement precision while dramatically reducing system complexity and operational time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If conventional asset tracking systems are used to cover portions of the chain, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates due to inability to optimize end-to-end transit operations and handle functions as independent events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidend-to-end transit optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges previously separate tracking functions into a unified end-to-end supply chain visibility platform. By combining inventory tracking, transportation monitoring, warehouse management, and logistics coordination into a single integrated system, the patent enables optimization of transit operations across the entire chain rather than treating functions as independent events. This integration improves productivity while maintaining manageable system complexity through centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking system is designed with universal functionality to handle multiple supply chain functions simultaneously - tracking inventory movement, monitoring transportation status, managing warehouse operations, and coordinating logistics. This multi-functional approach allows the system to optimize end-to-end transit operations while avoiding the need for separate specialized systems, thereby improving productivity without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If manual entry and tracking of dates is performed, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of time increases due to costly and time-consuming tasks for managing sequence of information, products, and currency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata entry requirementsVSAvoidtime for managing supply chain information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated capture of critical supply chain data at each transaction point. Dates, product information, and currency details are automatically recorded when goods are scanned, weighed, or transferred, eliminating the need for subsequent manual data entry. This preliminary automated action reduces time loss by ensuring data is already available for processing before it is needed for financial transactions or inventory management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Manual data entry processes are replaced with automated electronic data capture systems. Scanners, RFID readers, and integrated software automatically extract and record dates, product information, and transaction details without human intervention. This substitution maintains data accuracy while dramatically reducing the time required to manage supply chain information and prepare financial records.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Device complexity

If legacy systems are used to manage supply and distribution chain, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates due to inability to respond to changing demands and create slow moving inventories

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem architectureVSAvoidresponse to changing demands
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates dynamic elements that allow real-time adaptation to changing supply chain demands. The software platform continuously updates inventory records, reoptimizes routes, and adjusts allocation decisions based on current conditions such as demand fluctuations, transportation delays, or inventory level changes. This dynamic response capability improves productivity by enabling the system to adapt to changing demands, whereas static legacy systems cannot respond timely enough.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements comprehensive feedback mechanisms where real-time data from sensors, scanners, and transaction records continuously informs decision-making. Inventory levels, transportation status, and demand patterns are monitored and fed back into the management system, enabling automatic adjustments to optimize productivity. This feedback loop allows the system to respond to changing demands dynamically, overcoming the limitations of legacy systems that lack real-time data integration and responsive decision-making capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10380534B2Autonomous supply and distribution chain
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 ROUTE4ME INC
  • US10380534B2 patent drawing
  • US10380534B2 patent drawing
  • US10380534B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for an autonomous supply and distribution chain management network are disclosed. A server may control and coordinate the processes involved in distributing a product from suppliers to the customers, including generation of purchase orders and payment of invoices. A defined set of interactions may occur in a particular sequence and at designated times that may permit the chain to be synchronized between a customer and a supplier. Unlike a regular supply and distribution chain, in which human beings decide vehicle or asset compatibility types, the autonomous chain of the present invention may maintain a compatibility database within the platform, as well as detailed information about each asset and how it can function interactively with the others. The invention may also allow for dynamic modification of transit operations to alter one or more destinations of the inventory while it is in transit to a new location at any time.