Autonomous Train Driving Model With Human Feedback Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for autonomous train operation, such as those described in Chinese Patent No. 117719535A, fail to account for other major environmental factors, systems, or controls which may only be present within the railway space, and do not address the conflict between the '535 patent are specifically directed towards autonomous cars and do not account for other major environmental factors, systems, or controls which may only be present within the railway space, and fail to address a completely autonomous system. For example, the '535 patent is designed such that a human driver's intervention is expected as the vehicle learns and does not provide for a completely autonomous system.

Innovation Solution

A train controller with a computation engine using a train model generated by a train model generator, which receives node data from sensors, adjusts the model based on human feedback, and optimizes the model using a reward structure to ensure efficient and safe train operation, incorporating both run data and simulated scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a human-in-the-loop interaction feedback system is used to train the autonomous vehicle model, then the model can gradually incorporate human decision-making, but the system requires continuous human intervention and does not achieve complete autonomy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous decision-making capabilityVSAvoidhuman intervention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses self-service by implementing autonomous collection and processing of interaction feedback data without requiring continuous human intervention. The feedback management module automatically collects feedback from multiple sources, processes it through the reinforcement learning module, and updates the decision-making model autonomously, enabling the system to improve itself without constant human input.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements comprehensive feedback mechanisms by collecting interaction feedback from multiple sources including human operators, system performance data, and environmental information. This feedback is processed through the reinforcement learning module to continuously update and optimize the decision-making model, enabling the system to learn and improve autonomously over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the train model is trained to arrive at destination as quick as possible, then speed and productivity improve, but fuel-efficiency and safety may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrain arrival speedVSAvoidsafety and fuel-efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters by adjusting speed, acceleration, and routing decisions based on real-time feedback from multiple sources. The reinforcement learning module optimizes these parameters to achieve the best balance between productivity, fuel-efficiency, and safety, allowing the train to adapt its operation to different conditions rather than following fixed schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic decision-making by continuously adapting to changing conditions through real-time feedback collection and processing. The train's operation is optimized dynamically based on current environmental conditions, energy levels, and safety requirements, rather than following predetermined static schedules, enabling flexible optimization of multiple competing objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a significant amount of data is collected to train a robust model capable of addressing potential situations, then model reliability improves, but training time and expense increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel robustnessVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-collecting and storing interaction feedback data from multiple sources before training sessions. The feedback management module accumulates data including human operator feedback, system performance data, and environmental information in advance, so that when training is needed, the model can be trained quickly on comprehensive data without requiring extensive data collection during the training process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of manufacture

If existing autonomous vehicle systems are adapted for train operation, then development time is reduced, but railway-specific environmental factors and controls are not accounted for

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem development timeVSAvoidrailway environment compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universality by designing a multi-functional feedback management module that can collect and process feedback from diverse sources including human operators, railway infrastructure sensors, environmental conditions, and train performance systems. This universal feedback collection mechanism enables the system to adapt to railway-specific requirements while maintaining a flexible architecture that can incorporate various data sources relevant to train operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250381994A1Systems and methods for providing autonomous train driving strategy
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 PROGRESS RAIL LOCOMOTIVE INC
  • US20250381994A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381994A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381994A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and method for operating a train are described herein. The train may include a plurality of nodes configured to detect a plurality of train variables and a train controller. The train controller including a memory storing computer-executable instructions; and a processor. The processor may be configured to receive a train model which may be configured to be used by a computation engine of the train controller to generate an output. The output may be displayed on an output device on the train controller. A human-user may input an indication into the train controller indicating that the generated output may be insufficient. The node data may be collected at a result of the input and transmitted to a train model generator.