Autonomous Vehicle Trajectory Planning With Hierarchical Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous navigation systems face challenges in quickly planning and re-planning vehicle trajectories to optimize travel time and safety, due to the need to account for new sensor data, obstacles, and dynamic vehicle conditions.

Innovation Solution

A tripartite path-planning system is employed, consisting of a global planner, a fast local planner with a simplified vehicle dynamics model, and a local planner with an advanced vehicle dynamics model. This system rapidly calculates and updates optimal trajectories, ensuring safety and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If trajectory is recalculated each time new sensor data is received to ensure reliability, then safety is improved, but computational overhead increases and processing speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory execution reliabilityVSAvoidroute processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The path planning system is divided into three hierarchical levels: global planner (long-term route), fast local planner (medium-term trajectory with simplified dynamics), and local planner (short-term control with advanced dynamics). This segmentation allows different planning frequencies and computational complexities at each level, enabling reliable trajectory recalculation without overwhelming computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the vehicle dynamics model complexity based on planning needs. The fast local planner uses a simplified dynamics model for quicker calculations, while the local planner uses an advanced dynamics model for precise control. This dynamic adaptation of model complexity optimizes the balance between calculation speed and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If advanced vehicle dynamics model is used in local planner to ensure safety within handling limits, then trajectory accuracy and safety are improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory precisionVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The planning system segments computational tasks across three levels. The local planner with advanced dynamics model focuses only on short-term control (last level of planning), while global and fast local planners handle higher-level route planning. This segmentation limits the computational burden on any single planner while maintaining overall trajectory precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The advanced vehicle dynamics model is applied locally at the local planner level where it is most needed for precise control and safety assurance. The simplified model is used at the fast local planner level for quicker trajectory generation. This localized application of complexity ensures high precision where required without unnecessary computational overhead elsewhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250083703A1Systems and methods for trajectory determination using periodic verification of vehicle control parameters
Publication Date: 2025.03.13 SIT AUTONOMOUS AG
  • US20250083703A1 patent drawing
  • US20250083703A1 patent drawing
  • US20250083703A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-layer path-planning system and method calculates trajectories for autonomous vehicles using a global planner, a fast local planner, and an optimizing local planner. The calculated trajectories are used to guide the autonomous vehicle along a bounded path between a starting point and a destination.