Autonomous Vehicle Trajectory Selection Using Perceived Risk Costs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles navigating complex environments face challenges in selecting trajectories that balance objective safety with perceived risk, leading to potential passenger discomfort and increased likelihood of human intervention.

Innovation Solution

The system determines a trajectory for an autonomous vehicle based on perceived risk by optimizing an overall cost function that includes risk components, allowing the vehicle to choose a path that minimizes perceived risk while maintaining objective safety standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicles select trajectories based only on objective safety constraints, then safety is ensured, but passenger comfort and perceived safety deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobjective safetyVSAvoidpassenger comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters of trajectory evaluation by introducing perceived risk cost components alongside traditional safety constraints. The cost function includes parameters for perceived safety, comfort, and natural driving behavior, allowing the vehicle to select trajectories that optimize both objective safety and passenger experience by adjusting weightings of different cost components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If autonomous vehicles prioritize perceived risk minimization, then passenger comfort improves, but navigation efficiency may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger comfortVSAvoidnavigation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system adjusts parameters in the cost function to balance perceived risk and navigation efficiency. By modifying the weighting of perceived safety costs versus time and distance costs, the vehicle can adapt its behavior to achieve acceptable passenger comfort while maintaining reasonable navigation efficiency through optimized parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If autonomous vehicles use complex cost functions with multiple risk components, then trajectory optimization improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory optimizationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex cost function into distinct, manageable components: safety constraint costs, perceived risk costs, and efficiency costs. Each component can be calculated and optimized independently, then combined to form the overall trajectory selection criterion, reducing computational complexity while maintaining comprehensive optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11958503B2Techniques for navigating an autonomous vehicle based on perceived risk
Publication Date: 2024.04.16 MOTIONAL AD LLC
  • US11958503B2 patent drawing
  • US11958503B2 patent drawing
  • US11958503B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for selecting a trajectory for an autonomous vehicle based on perceived risk are provided. A trajectory is selected that satisfies objective safety constraints and minimizes an overall cost based at least in part on cost components representing the perceived risk of the trajectory. The vehicle is navigated according to the selected (e.g., optimized) trajectory.