Autonomous Trip State Interfaces for Passenger Action Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle systems lack efficient state-based operations that dynamically adapt to passenger actions, leading to suboptimal user experiences and resource management.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that determine the current state of an autonomous vehicle trip from predefined states, identify associated computing devices, generate data for interfaces, and communicate these interfaces to the devices, enabling dynamic adaptation to passenger actions and improving resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the autonomous vehicle system continuously monitors and processes all possible passenger actions and states, then the system can provide comprehensive service coverage, but the computational resources and processing time are excessively consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The trip is divided into multiple discrete states (e.g., parked, en route to pickup, en route to destination, arrived). The computing system only processes and monitors actions relevant to the current state, rather than continuously analyzing all possible passenger actions across all states. This segmentation reduces computational overhead while maintaining comprehensive service coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-defines a set of possible states and their associated relevant actions before the trip begins. By having the state framework prepared in advance, the system can quickly determine the current state and only process relevant actions, avoiding the need to continuously evaluate all possible actions during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If the system provides detailed and comprehensive interfaces for all possible trip states, then the user experience is enhanced, but the interface complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidinterface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface is segmented and customized based on the current trip state. Different states (parked, en route, arrived) have different relevant interfaces displayed. This ensures that passengers only see and interact with interfaces relevant to their current situation, enhancing ease of operation while reducing overall interface complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The interface configuration is dynamic and changes automatically based on the determined current state. The system generates and communicates state-specific interface data to the passenger's computing device, allowing the interface to adapt to the current context without requiring a single complex static interface design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If the autonomous vehicle system processes all passenger actions in real-time, then the response accuracy is improved, but the processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the processing task by first determining the current state, then only processing actions relevant to that state. This two-stage approach maintains response accuracy by ensuring relevant actions are captured while significantly reducing processing time by excluding irrelevant actions from real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary state determination before processing specific actions. By having the state framework ready in advance and using it to filter relevant actions, the system achieves accurate real-time response without the computational burden of analyzing all possible actions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12270663B2State-based autonomous-vehicle operations
Publication Date: 2025.04.08 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US12270663B2 patent drawing
  • US12270663B2 patent drawing
  • US12270663B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to state-based autonomous-vehicle operations. In particular, the methods, devices, and systems of the present disclosure can: determine, based at least in part on one or more actions of a passenger associated with a trip of an autonomous vehicle, a current state of the trip from amongst a plurality of different predefined states of the trip; identify, based at least in part on the current state of the trip, one or more computing devices associated with the passenger; generate, based at least in part on the current state of the trip, data describing one or more interfaces for display by the computing device(s) associated with the passenger; and communicate, to the computing device(s) associated with the passenger, the data describing the interface(s) for display.