Autonomous Vehicle Turning Control for Narrow-Area Coverage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in efficiently navigating and covering working areas, particularly in narrow spaces and areas with obstacles, due to poor path planning, leading to reduced efficiency, increased mechanical wear, and shortened service life.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous vehicle with a central axis dividing it into left and right sides, equipped with a driving module, limit detecting module, and control module, which detects the location relationship with limits and makes rational turns to maintain a smaller distance from one side to the limit, allowing continuous movement and improved coverage efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the autonomous vehicle adopts random paths during moving and stops frequently to make turns, then it can navigate through the working scope, but it increases stopping times and reduces overall moving speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation capabilityVSAvoidstopping time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle performs preliminary actions by detecting limits ahead of time and planning turn paths in advance. The control module predicts future positions and calculates optimal turn paths before the vehicle actually needs to turn, allowing smoother transitions and reducing stopping time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle dynamically adjusts its moving speed and turn radius based on real-time position and limit detection. The control module continuously updates the turn path parameters to optimize the balance between maintaining coverage and minimizing stopping time, making the navigation adaptive rather than static.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If the autonomous vehicle stops and makes random turns in narrow areas, then it can attempt to leave the area, but it increases the time needed to leave and may fail to leave

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle narrow areasVSAvoidtime to leave narrow area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control module continuously monitors the vehicle's position relative to limits and uses this feedback to adjust the turn path in real-time. By detecting whether the vehicle is in a narrow area and how close it is to limits, the system dynamically modifies the turn strategy to ensure successful exit while minimizing time spent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle performs preliminary detection of narrow areas and calculates optimal escape paths before fully entering problematic situations. The control module anticipates potential trapping scenarios and prepares appropriate turn sequences in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Area of stationary object

If the autonomous vehicle frequently starts and stops in the whole working process, then it can cover the working area, but it reduces overall moving speed and increases mechanical wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworking area coverageVSAvoidoverall moving speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle maintains continuous motion by planning turn paths that minimize stopping. The control module calculates turn sequences that allow the vehicle to maintain momentum and reduces the frequency of complete stops, thereby preserving productivity while still achieving comprehensive area coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically optimizes the balance between coverage and speed by adjusting turn frequencies and paths based on the vehicle's current position, battery level, and mission progress. This dynamic optimization reduces unnecessary stops while ensuring complete coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If the autonomous vehicle adopts random turning paths, then it can navigate obstacles, but it fails to rationally judge the optimal turning direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle handling capabilityVSAvoiddirection judgment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The control module performs preliminary calculations of multiple possible turn paths and evaluates them based on coverage efficiency and progress toward mission goals. By pre-calculating and comparing different turning options, the system makes informed decisions rather than random choices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from limit detection and position monitoring to continuously refine turn path selection. The control module evaluates the effectiveness of previous turns and adjusts future turn directions based on this feedback, improving direction judgment accuracy over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3876068B1Automatic working system, automatic walking device and steering method thereof
Publication Date: 2024.10.09 POSITEC POWER TOOLS (SUZHOU) CO LTD
  • EP3876068B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3876068B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3876068B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A turning method is implemented in an autonomous vehicle having a central axis which divides the autonomous vehicle into left side and right side. In the method, the autonomous vehicle moves towards a limit; the autonomous vehicle monitors the location relationship of the vehicle with the limit; and the autonomous vehicle judges which side is closer to the limit when reaching a predetermined location relationship with the limit. The autonomous vehicle makes a turn and moves away from the limit, so that the distance from one side of the autonomous vehicle to the limit is always smaller than that from the other side to the limit. An autonomous vehicle and an autonomous working system are also disclosed.