Mapping an environment around an autonomous vacuum

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional autonomous floor cleaning systems face limitations in adaptability, mobility, stain removal, waste storage, navigation, and user interaction, particularly when dealing with various surface types and messes, including obstacles and unpredictable environments.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous cleaning robot with a vertically-actuated cleaning head, sensor system, and waste bag that adjusts height based on surface and mess type, uses audiovisual sensors for navigation and user interaction, and includes a mop roller with abrasive material for effective stain removal, while mapping the environment and detecting messes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the cleaning head is set at a fixed optimal height for cleaning efficacy, then cleaning performance is improved, but mobility and adaptability to different surfaces are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning efficacyVSAvoidadaptability to different surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning head height is made dynamically adjustable through an actuator system that automatically modifies the height based on detected surface types and mess characteristics. This allows the system to optimize cleaning contact pressure for each specific situation rather than maintaining a fixed height setting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The autonomous vacuum uses its own sensor data and processing capabilities to automatically determine optimal cleaning head height settings without requiring external intervention. The system self-adjusts based on real-time environmental perception, eliminating the need for manual user adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If the cleaning head is lowered to improve cleaning of messes, then cleaning performance is improved, but mobility and ability to move over obstacles are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning performanceVSAvoidmobility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning head height is dynamically adjusted based on real-time detection of mess types and surface characteristics. When a mess is detected, the system lowers the cleaning head to optimize contact; when no mess is present or obstacles are detected, the head is raised to improve mobility and prevent damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the height parameter of the cleaning head based on detected conditions. By modifying this critical parameter in response to environmental feedback, the system optimizes the trade-off between cleaning effectiveness and mobility for different operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If manual adjustment of cleaning head height is performed to optimize cleaning, then cleaning efficacy is improved, but user interaction complexity and time are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning efficacyVSAvoiduser interaction
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vacuum performs self-adjustment of cleaning head height using its integrated sensors and control system. The device independently detects surface types, mess characteristics, and obstacle locations, then automatically modifies cleaning head position without requiring any manual intervention from the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical adjustment system is replaced with an automated electro-mechanical actuation system controlled by sensor feedback. This substitution eliminates the need for direct user manipulation of height controls while achieving optimized cleaning performance through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If pressure is applied to the mop roller to remove tough stains, then stain removal is improved, but water retention capability of the microfiber cloth is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestain removal efficacyVSAvoidwater retention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies pressure to the mop roller in periodic or intermittent cycles rather than continuously. During cleaning passes, pressure is applied to remove tough stains; during water pickup phases, pressure is reduced or removed to allow the microfiber cloth to retain water effectively. This periodic variation in pressure optimizes both stain removal and water retention at different stages of the cleaning cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20260033688A1Mapping an environment around an autonomous vacuum
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 MATIC ROBOTS INC
  • US20260033688A1 patent drawing
  • US20260033688A1 patent drawing
  • US20260033688A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous cleaning robot (e.g., an autonomous vacuum) may use a sensor system to map an environment that may be used to determine where to clean. The autonomous vacuum receives visual data about the environment and determines a ground plane of the environment based on the visual data. The autonomous vacuum detects objects within the environment based on the ground plane. For each object, the autonomous vacuum segments a three-dimensional (3D) representation of the object out of the visual data and determines whether the object is static or dynamic. The autonomous vacuum adds static objects to a long-term level of a map of the environment and dynamic objects to an intermediate level of the map. The autonomous vacuum may further add virtual borders, flags, walls, and messes to the map.