Autonomous vacuum mopping system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous cleaning robots are typically specialized for specific cleaning tasks, requiring multiple devices and facing issues like height discrepancies, component loss, and system clogs when trying to combine sweeping and mopping functionalities in a single system.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous vacuum with a magnetic locking system and snorkel ducts that secures the cleaning head in a mopping position, allowing for effective scrubbing and separates wet and dry debris streams to prevent clogs, while the actuator system switches between sweeping and mopping modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple specialized cleaning robots are used for different cleaning tasks, then cleaning functionality and reliability are improved, but device complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecleaning functionalityVSAvoidnumber of devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines sweeping and mopping functionalities into a single autonomous cleaning robot. The device integrates a sweeper roller for dry debris and a mop roller for wet cleaning, allowing one robot to perform multiple cleaning tasks that previously required separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cleaning robot is designed with universal cleaning capabilities through interchangeable cleaning heads and multiple cleaning modes. The device can switch between sweeping, mopping, and combined cleaning operations, making it adaptable to various floor surfaces and cleaning requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If sweeping and mopping functionalities are combined in one system, then device quantity and space usage are reduced, but system complexity and component reliability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of devicesVSAvoidcomponent stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning robot divides its cleaning system into separate functional modules: a sweeper roller module for dry debris and a mop roller module for wet cleaning. Each module can operate independently, and the segmentation allows for easier maintenance and reduced interference between components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs dynamic height adjustment mechanisms that allow the cleaning head to adapt its position based on the cleaning mode. The sweeper roller and mop roller can be independently positioned at optimal heights, and the system dynamically switches between configurations to maintain reliability during mode transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by moving object

If a single cleaning robot performs both sweeping and mopping, then power consumption and space requirements are reduced, but system complexity and maintenance needs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidsystem interactions
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot is designed to perform sweeping and mopping operations in continuous sequences without requiring shutdown or reconfiguration. The transition between modes is seamless, with the system maintaining operational continuity by dynamically adjusting component positions and activation states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The cleaning robot incorporates self-cleaning capabilities where the sweeper roller can be cleaned by the mop roller and vice versa. The system automatically manages its own maintenance needs through integrated cleaning mechanisms, reducing external intervention requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables a single device to perform both sweeping and mopping efficiently, reducing the need for multiple robots and minimizing system clogs, with improved cleaning performance and reduced power consumption.

Implementation Method 1

one or more baseplate magnets are rigidly attached to the baseplate and exposed on the front side of the body enclosure... Back tube magnets are attached to the exterior surface of the back tube opposite the back side of the cleaning head and exposed in alignment with the exposed magnetic poles of corresponding base-plate magnets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS20240049936A1Autonomous vacuum mopping system
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 MATIC ROBOTS INC
  • US20240049936A1 patent drawing
  • US20240049936A1 patent drawing
  • US20240049936A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous vacuum includes mopping and sweeping functionalities. A magnetic locking system secures a cleaning head of the autonomous vacuum into a mopping position when in a mopping state, allowing the vacuum to move a mop roller back and forth to scrub stubborn stains on a floor surface without the cleaning head shifting into an alternate sweeping position. The autonomous vacuum also includes snorkel ducts to direct fluid waste and water from the mop roller to a waste bag without mixing the fluid waste with dry waste collected by a sweeping system. The snorkel ducts are configured to kink shut when the cleaning head is in a sweeping state, to avoid unnecessary suction through the snorkel system. Additionally, the mopping system includes cleaning logic routines that can sense and control mop roller saturation and drying, and that can perform automatic mop cleaning.