Autonomous Vehicle Aberrant Situation Detection for Cargo Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in detecting and responding to aberrant situations such as cargo theft, as existing systems lack effective mechanisms to identify and mitigate such threats in real-time, especially in environments where human intervention is not possible.

Innovation Solution

A self-driving vehicle system equipped with a perception system, communication system, and control system that uses sensors to detect aberrant situations, evaluates the environment, and takes corrective actions such as rerouting or alerting authorities, while differentiating between permissible and impermissible situations based on sensor data and cargo type.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous vehicles operate without human drivers, then productivity is improved through continuous operation, but reliability deteriorates due to increased vulnerability to cargo theft and aberrant situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operation capabilityVSAvoidcargo security
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of aberrant situations by continuously monitoring the environment using sensors before cargo theft can occur. The control system evaluates sensor data in real-time to identify potential threats such as unauthorized access attempts, unusual vehicle orientations, or suspicious objects near the cargo area, enabling preventive action before actual theft occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors monitor the environment, the control system evaluates the data against expected behavior patterns, and corrective actions are automatically executed. When aberrant situations are detected, the system provides feedback by alerting remote operators and automatically responding through the driving system, creating a closed-loop security mechanism that operates without human drivers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the vehicle implements comprehensive sensor monitoring and evaluation systems, then reliability is improved through detection of aberrant situations, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaberrant situation detectionVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into distinct functional modules: sensor subsystems for data collection, control system for data evaluation and decision-making, communication system for remote alerting, and driving system for automatic corrective actions. Each module operates independently but integrates through standardized interfaces, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The sensor system and control system are designed to handle multiple types of aberrant situations through a unified architecture. The same sensors and evaluation algorithms detect various threats including cargo theft attempts, unusual vehicle orientations, suspicious objects, and environmental hazards, eliminating the need for separate specialized systems for each threat type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the vehicle takes automatic corrective actions upon detecting aberrant situations, then cargo security is improved, but loss of information increases due to potential false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo protectionVSAvoidsituation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses feedback mechanisms to verify detected aberrant situations before executing corrective actions. Sensor data is continuously evaluated against expected behavior patterns, and the system monitors the results of corrective actions to ensure they achieve the intended security effect. This feedback loop reduces false positives by confirming actual threats before automatic response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The communication system acts as an intermediary between the control system and remote operators. When aberrant situations are detected, the system first alerts remote operators who can verify the situation and provide guidance before automatic corrective actions are executed. This intermediary layer reduces false positives by allowing human verification of potentially erroneous detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11866001B1Safety considerations for self-driving vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.01.09 WAYMO LLC
  • US11866001B1 patent drawing
  • US11866001B1 patent drawing
  • US11866001B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology relates to detection of aberrant driving situations during operation of a vehicle in an autonomous driving mode. Aberrant situations may include potential theft or unsafe conditions, which are determined according to one or more signals. The signals are derived from information detected about the environment around the vehicle, such as from one or more sensors disposed on the vehicle. In response to an aberrant situation, the vehicle may take various corrective action, such as rerouting, locking down the vehicle or communicating with remote assistance. The type of corrective action taken may depend on a type of cargo being transported or whether one or more passengers are in the vehicle. If there are passengers, the system may communicate with the passengers via the passenger's client computing devices or by presenting visual or audible information via a user interface system of the vehicle.