Autonomous Vehicle System Classifies Neighboring Driver Behavior

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing complexity of traffic safety due to the mixture of legacy and autonomous vehicles with varying levels of driving capabilities makes it difficult to predict how cars will respond to each other, leading to potential accidents.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous vehicle system that uses sensors and machine learning models to classify the behavioral characteristics of neighboring vehicles, updating its driving plan to ensure safe operations by controlling its movements based on the classifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle uses sensors and machine learning models to classify behavioral characteristics of neighboring vehicles, then the safety and adaptability of autonomous driving is improved, but the device complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of autonomous driving by classifying neighboring vehicles into distinct behavioral categories (aggressive, defensive, neutral) based on observed characteristics. This segmentation allows the autonomous vehicle to apply different driving strategies for each category, simplifying the overall decision-making process while maintaining high safety standards through targeted analysis of specific behavioral patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of vehicle behavior classification from raw sensor data to categorized behavioral characteristics. By transforming continuous sensor observations into discrete behavioral categories (aggressive, defensive, neutral), the system reduces computational complexity while preserving essential safety information needed for reliable autonomous driving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the autonomous vehicle continuously monitors and classifies neighboring vehicles, then the adaptability to mixed traffic conditions is improved, but the loss of time for data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to mixed trafficVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of neighboring vehicles into behavioral categories based on initial sensor observations. By pre-classifying vehicles before critical driving decisions are required, the system reduces real-time processing time while maintaining adaptability to mixed traffic conditions. The classification framework is established in advance, allowing rapid response to varying traffic scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where classification results are used to adjust driving behavior, and new sensor data refines future classifications. This feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to changing traffic conditions efficiently, processing only relevant updates rather than continuously analyzing all raw sensor data, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If the autonomous vehicle updates its driving plan based on classified behavioral characteristics, then the responsiveness to neighboring vehicles is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresponsivenessVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by implementing different driving strategies tailored to each classified behavioral category. Instead of using a single complex control algorithm for all situations, the system selects and applies appropriate local strategies (e.g., more cautious approach to aggressive vehicles, more assertive behavior toward defensive vehicles). This reduces overall system complexity by using simpler, targeted control logic for each specific scenario while maintaining high responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The driving plan is dynamically updated based on classified behavioral characteristics of neighboring vehicles. The system transitions between different driving modes and strategies in real-time according to the classified behavior categories, enabling responsive adaptation without requiring a completely complex re-planning algorithm. The dynamic nature of the system allows it to switch between pre-defined strategic responses based on classification results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10957201B2System and method for relative positioning based safe autonomous driving
Publication Date: 2021.03.23 QUALCOMM INC
  • US10957201B2 patent drawing
  • US10957201B2 patent drawing
  • US10957201B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a method and apparatus for managing a driving plan of an autonomous vehicle. The method may include obtaining observations of a neighboring vehicle using one or more sensors of the autonomous vehicle. The method may also include classifying one or more behavioral driving characteristics of the neighboring vehicle based on the observations. Furthermore, the method may include updating the driving plan based on a classification of the one or more behavioral driving characteristics of the neighboring vehicle, and controlling one or more operations of the autonomous vehicle based on the updated driving plan.