Autonomous Vehicle Behavior Detection and Counteraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Partially autonomous motor vehicles face challenges in navigating through environments where other road users exhibit irregular behaviors, such as obstructive or malicious actions, which can impair their operation, especially when these users recognize the vehicle's autonomous nature and lower inhibition thresholds apply.

Innovation Solution

A method for operating a partially autonomous motor vehicle that analyzes sensor data to identify impairing behaviors and triggers counteractions, including acoustic and visual signals, and wireless messages to deter such behaviors, utilizing behavior models trained by machine learning algorithms to recognize and respond to obstructive or malicious actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicles rely on collision avoidance strategies to navigate traffic, then safety is improved, but vulnerable to obstructive behaviors by road users who recognize the vehicle's autonomous nature

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidobstructive behaviors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by detecting impairing behaviors early and triggering counteracting actions before the obstruction can fully impact vehicle operation. The control device monitors sensor data for signs of obstructive behavior and proactively responds with countermeasures such as acoustic signals, visual signals, or communication with infrastructure, preventing the behavior from escalating into a safety hazard.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the harmful obstructive behavior into a beneficial situation by using the detected impairing behavior as input to trigger appropriate counteractions. The control device transforms the negative input (obstruction attempt) into a positive outcome (deterrence through acoustic/visual signals or infrastructure communication), thereby turning the harmful interaction into an opportunity to reinforce safe operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Reliability

If the vehicle triggers multiple counteracting actions to deter obstructive behaviors, then effectiveness in countering interference is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness in countering interferenceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device performs multiple functions using a single integrated system. It detects impairing behaviors through sensor data analysis, determines appropriate counteractions based on the detected behavior type, and executes various countermeasures (acoustic signals, visual signals, infrastructure communication) all through one control device. This multi-functional approach reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate dedicated systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the detection, decision-making, and execution functions into a single integrated control device. Instead of having separate systems for detecting obstructive behaviors, deciding on counteractions, and executing them, the patent combines these functions into one unified control device that handles the entire process, thereby reducing system complexity while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If the vehicle uses sensor data analysis with behavior models to identify impairing behaviors, then detection accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-training behavior models with training data that represents various impairing behaviors. These pre-trained models are stored in the control device and can be rapidly applied to real-time sensor data without requiring extensive processing during actual operation. The preliminary training phase separates the computationally intensive model development from the real-time detection phase, reducing processing time during vehicle operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by focusing the behavior model analysis on specific characteristics of sensor data that are most indicative of impairing behaviors. Rather than analyzing all possible aspects of sensor data equally, the control device concentrates computational resources on the most relevant features identified by the trained behavior models, thereby achieving high detection accuracy with reduced processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11377113B2Method for operating an at least partially autonomous motor vehicle and motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2022.07.05 AUDI AG
  • US11377113B2 patent drawing
  • US11377113B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a partially autonomous motor vehicle, wherein in a non-parked state of the motor vehicle, sensor data of a sensor device, which detects at least one person in the surroundings of the motor vehicle, are analyzed with respect to a behavior of the person disadvantageously impairing the further driving operation of the motor vehicle and at least one action counteracting the behavior of the person is triggered in dependence on the analysis result.