Autonomous Vehicle Behavior Prediction for Smoother Hazard Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional autonomous vehicle systems face increased driving complexity and computational burden due to the need to constantly analyze and react to rapidly changing environments, leading to abrupt changes in vehicle path and potential degradation of passenger comfort.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a conditional prior system that predicts likely behaviors based on predefined patterns and conditions, allowing vehicles to proactively adjust perception, prediction, and planning operations to anticipate and respond to expected scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional autonomous vehicle systems constantly analyze and react to rapidly changing environments, then the vehicle can respond to immediate hazards, but driving complexity and computational burden increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse to hazardsVSAvoiddriving complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting likely future states and behaviors of objects in the environment before they actually occur. The prediction component generates multiple possible future scenarios and prepares response strategies in advance, allowing the vehicle to react more efficiently when hazards materialize without requiring constant complex analysis of every environmental change

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If conventional autonomous vehicle systems constantly analyze and react to rapidly changing environments, then the vehicle can maintain safety, but computational burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcomputational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary computational work by generating predictions of future states and evaluating multiple scenarios in advance. The prediction component creates a hierarchy of likely outcomes and prepares response strategies before hazards occur, reducing the real-time computational burden while maintaining safety through pre-evaluated response options

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The computational task is segmented into distinct components: the prediction component handles future state forecasting, the planning component develops response strategies based on predictions, and the control component executes selected actions. This segmentation allows each component to focus on specific computational aspects, improving overall efficiency while maintaining comprehensive safety analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If conventional autonomous vehicle systems constantly adjust vehicle path to react to environment, then the vehicle can avoid hazards, but abrupt changes degrade passenger comfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard avoidanceVSAvoidpassenger comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting likely hazard scenarios and preparing multiple response trajectories in advance. When a hazard is detected, the planning component selects from pre-evaluated response options that have already been assessed for comfort implications, allowing safe hazard avoidance with smoother, more predictable vehicle adjustments rather than abrupt reactive maneuvers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260054751A1Systems and methods for configuring autonomous vehicle operation
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 LYFT INC
  • US20260054751A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054751A1 patent drawing
  • US20260054751A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, methods, and non-transitory computer-readable media can detect an occurrence of a condition in an environment based on sensor data captured by a vehicle. A determination is made whether the occurrence of the condition satisfies a threshold associated with a likelihood that a behavior associated with an object in the environment will occur based on an interaction between the condition and the object, wherein the likelihood is based on prior observations of one or more objects. Subsequent to determining that the threshold is satisfied, a vehicle operation that is associated with the likelihood that the behavior associated with the object will occur is performed.