Autonomous Vehicle Caution Mode for Crowded Object Clusters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in navigating computationally-intensive and increased risk environments, such as crowded areas, where perceiving and tracking numerous objects requires significant computational resources and can pose safety risks.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a caution mode system that determines whether to enter an operation mode with limited capabilities based on properties of object clusters, such as number, area, and proximity to the vehicle's planned route, allowing the vehicle to control its speed and restrict certain maneuvers to reduce computational load and enhance safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the autonomous vehicle perceives and tracks numerous objects in crowded environments, then the object detection capability is improved, but the computational resource consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection capabilityVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the environment into clusters of objects based on spatial proximity and group characteristics. Instead of processing each object individually, the system groups multiple objects into clusters and processes them as unified entities, significantly reducing computational load while maintaining detection effectiveness in crowded areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by selectively processing only certain clusters based on their properties (size, density, proximity to vehicle). Not all clusters receive the same level of processing attention - only those that pose potential risks or require detailed analysis are processed in full detail, while others receive simplified handling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle operates in caution mode with limited capabilities, then the safety is improved, but the operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operational capabilities based on real-time environmental assessment. The vehicle transitions between full operational mode and caution mode with limited capabilities depending on the presence and properties of object clusters. This dynamic adaptation allows the vehicle to maintain high efficiency in safe conditions while ensuring safety when risks are detected

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (speed limits, maneuver restrictions, detection thresholds) based on the assessed risk level. When operating in caution mode, parameters are adjusted to prioritize safety, but these changes are temporary and reversible when the environment becomes safer, thus balancing safety requirements with operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the autonomous vehicle clusters objects based on multiple properties, then the navigation accuracy is improved, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex processing task into distinct stages: initial object detection, spatial clustering based on proximity, property assessment of clusters, and risk evaluation. This segmentation breaks down the complex navigation decision-making into manageable steps, improving accuracy without overwhelming the processing system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing qualities to different clusters based on their local properties. High-priority clusters (those close to the vehicle, large in size, or dense) receive detailed analysis with multiple properties evaluated, while distant or sparse clusters receive simplified processing. This local quality approach optimizes the balance between navigation accuracy and processing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12319316B2Systems and methods for autonomous vehicle controls
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 AURORA OPERATIONS INC
  • US12319316B2 patent drawing
  • US12319316B2 patent drawing
  • US12319316B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for controlling autonomous vehicle are provided. A method can include obtaining, by a computing system, data indicative of a plurality of objects in a surrounding environment of the autonomous vehicle. The method can further include determining, by the computing system, one or more clusters of the objects based at least in part on the data indicative of the plurality of objects. The method can further include determining, by the computing system, whether to enter an operation mode having one or more limited operational capabilities based at least in part on one or more properties of the one or more clusters. In response to determining that the operation mode is to be entered by the autonomous vehicle, the method can include controlling, by the computing system, the operation of the autonomous vehicle based at least in part on the one or more limited operational capabilities.