Autonomous Vehicle Collision Prevention via Localization Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous driving solutions are inadequate for dynamically changing environments, such as collaborative industrial settings, as they rely on limited sensors and algorithms prone to errors, leading to potential collisions between autonomous vehicles and humans, requiring continuous human oversight.

Innovation Solution

A collision prevention system that uses a localization system, including ultra-wideband and optical technologies, to determine the positions of autonomous vehicles and humans, locking the vehicle if a collision is predicted and alerting the human, allowing unlocking only by the identified individual once the danger has passed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If fixed trajectory solutions are used for autonomous vehicles, then the vehicle can operate along predetermined paths, but the system cannot adapt to dynamically changing environments and collaborative work areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to dynamically changing environmentsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static fixed trajectory paths to dynamic real-time collision prevention by continuously monitoring positions of autonomous vehicles and humans using localization systems. The collision determination unit dynamically adjusts safety measures based on real-time position data, enabling adaptation to changing environments without requiring complex reprogramming of navigation paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the localization system constantly provides position information to the collision determination unit, which then determines whether predefined collision conditions are met. This feedback mechanism enables real-time collision prevention while maintaining relatively simple system architecture by using standardized communication protocols and predefined safety conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If advanced sensors and algorithms are deployed for collision detection, then collision prevention capability improves, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention reliabilityVSAvoidsensor and algorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The collision prevention system is segmented into distinct functional modules: a localization system for position determination, a collision determination unit for analyzing collision risk, and alert mechanisms. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall system reliability without requiring all components to be highly complex.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The collision determination unit acts as an intermediary between the localization system and the autonomous vehicle control system. It processes position data from the localization system, applies predefined collision conditions, and triggers appropriate safety actions. This intermediary layer simplifies the overall system by centralizing the complex decision-making logic in a dedicated unit rather than distributing complexity across multiple sensors and algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If direct proximity measurements are used for collision detection, then the system responds quickly to immediate threats, but global positioning and situation awareness are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection speedVSAvoidglobal positioning information
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges direct proximity measurements from the localization system with global position information in a unified collision determination framework. The localization system provides both immediate proximity data for rapid response and global positioning context, which are combined in the collision determination unit to make comprehensive safety decisions without losing either speed or positional awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances safety by preventing collisions in dynamic environments through precise positioning and alerting mechanisms, reducing the reliance on human oversight and improving navigation assistance for autonomous vehicles in collaborative work areas.

Implementation Method 1

The localization system may comprise an ultra-wideband (UWB)-based localization system. The localization system may hereby be based on a radio technology which may, for example, use a relatively low energy level for short-range, high-bandwidth communications

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltra-wideband radio transmission: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The localization system may, in some other example implementations, comprise an optical unit, such as one or more cameras and/or scanners

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Light

Data Source

PatentUS11244568B2Collision prevention system and method
Publication Date: 2022.02.08 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US11244568B2 patent drawing
  • US11244568B2 patent drawing
  • US11244568B2 patent drawing

AI summary

We generally describe a collision prevention system (100) comprising: a localization system (402) for determining positions of an autonomous vehicle (104) and a human (106); and a collision determination unit (404) coupled to or in communication with the localization system (402), wherein the collision determination unit (404) is configured to determine, based on the determined positions of the autonomous vehicle (104) and the human (106), whether a predefined condition for an anticipated collision of the autonomous vehicle (104) with the human (106) is met; wherein the collision prevention system (100) is configured to: lock the autonomous vehicle (104) if the predefined condition is met; alert the human (106) for whom the predefined condition for colliding with the autonomous vehicle (104) is met; and allow unlocking of the autonomous vehicle (104) to be performed or initialized by the alerted human (106) only.