Autonomous Vehicle Correction Factors for Human-Like Driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles lack the ability to mimic human driving behavior effectively, leading to passenger discomfort due to unpredictable speed and steering control.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous vehicle system that uses crowd-sourced data to determine nominal vehicle characteristics and apply correction factors based on variance, allowing the vehicle to adjust speed and steering to match human-like driving patterns, utilizing a computing device with data storage and processing capabilities to receive and analyze vehicle data from other vehicles on the same road segment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If autonomous vehicles control speed and steering in a predictable manner, then passenger comfort improves, but the ability to mimic human driving behavior deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger comfortVSAvoidhuman-like driving behavior
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-determines nominal vehicle characteristics (speed, steering angle) and correction factors for upcoming road segments before the vehicle reaches them. This allows the vehicle to proactively adjust its behavior to match human driving patterns while maintaining predictable overall control, resolving the contradiction between comfort and human-like behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses crowd-sourced data as feedback to continuously adjust vehicle characteristics. By comparing actual vehicle performance against nominal values derived from human driver data, the system can mimic human driving behavior while maintaining predictable control through systematic correction factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the vehicle adjusts speed and steering to match crowd-sourced data, then human-like driving behavior improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman-like driving behaviorVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system determines nominal vehicle characteristics and correction factors in advance for upcoming road segments, storing this information before it is needed. This preliminary preparation reduces real-time computational complexity while maintaining the ability to exhibit human-like driving behavior through pre-calculated adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses crowd-sourced data from other vehicles as a template or copy of human driving behavior. Instead of implementing complex human-like control algorithms from scratch, the system copies established driving patterns from the crowd-sourced nominal values, reducing system complexity while achieving human-like behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10303176B2Determining variance factors for complex road segments
Publication Date: 2019.05.28 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10303176B2 patent drawing
  • US10303176B2 patent drawing
  • US10303176B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle computing device includes a data storage medium and a processing circuit. The processing circuit is programmed to receive from the data storage medium, a vehicle characteristic associated with an autonomous vehicle, receive historical data associated with the vehicle characteristic at a first road segment, determine a correction factor for the autonomous vehicle based at least in part on the historical data, and apply the correction factor to the vehicle characteristic to operate the autonomous vehicle in accordance with the historical data.