Autonomous Vehicle Failover Control for Mode-Specific Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in responding to triggering events due to communication latencies with remote monitoring systems, leading to potential mode confusion and inappropriate failover responses.

Innovation Solution

A control system on-board the autonomous vehicle determines its operational mode and tailors the failover response based on the presence of a human driver, allowing for localized decision-making to address triggering events, such as entering manual control mode if a driver is present or stopping if not, thereby reducing reliance on remote systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle relies on remote monitoring systems for failover responses, then centralized control and monitoring capability are improved, but communication latency and response time deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized control reliabilityVSAvoidcommunication latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the failover control system into two parts: a remote monitoring system for centralized oversight and an on-board computing device for local real-time decision-making. This segmentation allows the system to maintain centralized control capabilities while enabling fast local responses to triggering events, thus resolving the contradiction between centralized control reliability and communication latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The on-board computing device acts as an intermediary between the remote monitoring system and the vehicle's failover systems. It receives monitoring data from remote systems but independently determines and executes failover responses locally, eliminating the need for real-time communication with remote systems during critical failover events and thus reducing communication latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If the autonomous vehicle uses a single failover response mode, then system simplicity is improved, but adaptability to different operational scenarios deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidfailover response adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic failover response selection based on the vehicle's current operational mode. The system automatically adjusts the failover response strategy according to whether the vehicle is in autonomous mode, manual mode, or transition mode, enabling adaptability to different scenarios while maintaining relatively simple control logic through mode-based classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the failover response parameters based on the operational mode detected by the computing device. Different operational modes trigger different failover actions (e.g., safe stopping in autonomous mode versus maintaining control in manual mode), allowing the system to be adaptable without requiring complex decision-making logic for each possible scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle implements mode-specific failover responses, then response accuracy and safety are improved, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailover response accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial monitoring where the on-board computing device performs selective failover response determination based on operational mode rather than continuously analyzing all possible failure scenarios. This partial action approach provides accurate mode-specific responses while consuming fewer computational resources compared to comprehensive analysis of all failover possibilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12589761B2Vehicle control system
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 AURORA OPERATIONS INC
  • US12589761B2 patent drawing
  • US12589761B2 patent drawing
  • US12589761B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for controlling a failover response of an autonomous vehicle are provided. In one example embodiment, a method includes determining, by one or more computing devices on-board an autonomous vehicle, an operational mode of the autonomous vehicle. The autonomous vehicle is configured to operate in at least a first operational mode in which a human driver is present in the autonomous vehicle and a second operational mode in which the human driver is not present in the autonomous vehicle. The method includes detecting a triggering event associated with the autonomous vehicle. The method includes determining actions to be performed by the autonomous vehicle in response to the triggering event based on the operational mode. The method includes providing one or more control signals to one or more of the systems on-board the autonomous vehicle to perform the one or more actions in response to the triggering event.