Autonomous Vehicle Intersection Path Inference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in accurately predicting vehicle trajectories through intersections due to inaccuracies in mapped lane segments, especially at high speeds where actual paths diverge from mapped representations.

Innovation Solution

A system that identifies intersections, objects, and outlets, determines constant curvature paths, generates reference paths, and adjusts driving operations based on predicted trajectories, using scoring functions and metadata application to ensure safe navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If mapped lane segments are used for trajectory prediction, then the system has a simple and reliable baseline approach, but the prediction accuracy deteriorates at intersections especially at high speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory prediction accuracyVSAvoidpath generation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the path generation process into distinct components: identifying outlets from the intersection, generating constant curvature paths to each outlet, scoring paths based on multiple criteria (heading discrepancy, curvature, lateral acceleration), and pruning to select feasible paths. This segmentation allows complex intersection navigation to be broken down into manageable, independent steps that can be processed systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts path generation based on current vehicle state (speed, heading) and intersection geometry. The constant curvature paths are generated on-demand rather than pre-defined, and the scoring function dynamically weights different path characteristics based on current conditions. This dynamic approach allows the system to handle diverse driving scenarios without requiring exhaustive pre-programming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If constant curvature paths are generated for multiple outlets, then trajectory prediction accuracy improves, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory prediction accuracyVSAvoidpath generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates constant curvature paths to all identified outlets (excessive action) but then applies a scoring and pruning mechanism to eliminate infeasible paths. This approach ensures that no potentially valid path is missed during generation, while the subsequent pruning step removes paths that fail to meet feasibility criteria (excessive computational effort on invalid paths). The balance between completeness and efficiency is achieved through this two-stage process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The scoring function provides feedback on path feasibility by evaluating multiple criteria including heading discrepancy at the target point, curvature constraints, and lateral acceleration limits. Paths that score below thresholds are pruned from consideration. This feedback mechanism guides the selection of feasible paths without requiring exhaustive evaluation of all possible trajectories, reducing computational burden while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If reference paths are generated that differ from mapped lane segments, then accuracy at high speeds improves, but deviation from standard mapped data increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory prediction accuracyVSAvoidflexibility in path selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes key parameters of the path representation by using constant curvature paths with dynamically calculated target points rather than relying on pre-defined mapped lane segments. The target point is positioned at a specific distance from the outlet along the polyline, and the constant curvature constraint ensures physically realistic paths that account for vehicle dynamics. This parameter change enables accurate representation of high-speed turning behavior that mapped segments cannot capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11358598B2Methods and systems for performing outlet inference by an autonomous vehicle to determine feasible paths through an intersection
Publication Date: 2022.06.14 VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA INVESTMENTS LLC
  • US11358598B2 patent drawing
  • US11358598B2 patent drawing
  • US11358598B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous vehicle identifies an intersection, identifies an object in proximity to the intersection, identifies a plurality of outlets of the intersection, and, for each outlet, identifies a polyline associated with the outlet, identifies a target point along the polyline, and determines a constant curvature path from the object to the target point. The system determines a score associated with each outlet based at least in part on the constant curvature path of the outlet, generates a pruned set of outlets that includes one or more of the outlets from the plurality of outlets based on its score, and for each outlet in the pruned set, generates a reference path from the object to the target point of the outlet.