Autonomous Vehicle Multi-Lane Control for Fault-Tolerant Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles with single-lane control architectures are unable to effectively handle faults, particularly at high speeds, leading to potential safety risks due to single points of failure in systems like braking or transmission.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a multi-lane control architecture with redundant systems for autonomous vehicles, allowing the vehicle to switch to alternate control lanes in case of faults, ensuring continued operation and safe state management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single-lane control architecture is used in autonomous vehicles, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability deteriorates due to single points of failure in systems like braking or transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault toleranceVSAvoidcontrol architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control architecture is segmented into multiple independent control lanes (first control lane, second control lane, third control lane), each capable of independently controlling vehicle operations. This segmentation allows the system to isolate faults to specific lanes while maintaining operational capability through alternative lanes, thereby improving reliability without requiring complete system redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically switches between different control lanes based on detected faults. When a fault is detected in one lane, the system automatically transitions control to another lane, enabling adaptive fault tolerance. This dynamic switching mechanism allows the system to maintain reliability while using a manageable control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multiple redundant control systems are implemented, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem robustnessVSAvoidnumber of control systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The redundant control systems are segmented into distinct control lanes with specialized functions. The first control lane handles normal operations, the second control lane handles fault conditions, and the third control lane provides additional redundancy. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high reliability while maintaining manageable complexity through functional differentiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different control lanes are assigned different levels of capability and function. The first control lane has full capability for normal operations, while subsequent lanes have reduced or specialized capabilities for fault conditions. This local quality differentiation allows the system to achieve reliability through targeted redundancy rather than complete duplication of all systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If control is switched to alternate lanes during faults, then the reliability is maintained, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to automatic fault management

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault-tolerant controlVSAvoidcontrol switching
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs automatic fault detection and self-switches to alternate control lanes without requiring operator intervention. The system monitors its own operational status and autonomously manages fault response by transitioning between control lanes, thereby maintaining reliability while eliminating the operational burden of manual fault management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP4235333B1Fault-tolerant control of an autonomous vehicle with multiple control lanes
Publication Date: 2025.07.09 UATC LLC
  • EP4235333B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4235333B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4235333B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An autonomous vehicle control system, an autonomous vehicle, and a computer-implemented method are provided. One aspect of the present disclosure relates to an autonomous vehicle control system comprising one or more processors and one or more tangible, non-transitory, computer readable media that store instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause the autonomous vehicle control system to perform operations. The operations of the aspect comprise receiving motion planning data for the vehicle and determining a first control lane of a plurality of control lanes for implementing a motion plan based on the motion planning data. The plurality of control lanes of the aspect comprise at least the first control lane and a second control lane different than the first control lane, wherein the first control lane is connected with a first set of vehicle actuation systems corresponding to the first control lane, wherein the second control lane is connected with a second set of vehicle actuation systems corresponding to the second control lane, wherein the first set of vehicle actuation systems comprise at least one first actuation system that is not present in the second set of vehicle actuation systems. The operations of the aspect further comprise determining one or more conditions associated with the vehicle and controlling the first control lane or the second control lane to adjust a motion of the vehicle based at least in part on the one or more conditions.