Autonomous Vehicle Scooter-Carrying for Multi-Modal Door-to-Door Trips

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current transportation systems face challenges in providing efficient, cost-effective, and environmentally friendly door-to-door solutions, as public transportation is costly and inefficient, while rideshare services are expensive and contribute to traffic congestion and environmental issues, and eco-friendly options like biking and scootering are less viable for longer distances due to availability and coordination difficulties.

Innovation Solution

Integrating multi-modal trips using autonomous vehicles equipped to carry and charge personal mobility vehicles like scooters and bicycles, allowing seamless transitions between different modes of transportation within a single rideshare experience, optimizing routes for time, cost, and user preferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If autonomous vehicles are used for door-to-door travel, then convenience and speed are improved, but cost and traffic congestion worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor-to-door travel convenienceVSAvoidtraffic congestion and environmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The journey is segmented into multiple legs using different transportation modes. The autonomous vehicle handles the door-to-door portions, while personal mobility vehicles handle the intermediate segments. This segmentation allows the AV fleet to be more efficient and reduced in size, thereby reducing traffic congestion and environmental impact while maintaining door-to-door convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges autonomous vehicle service with personal mobility vehicle rental into a single integrated offering. The AV delivers the PMV to the passenger's location, and the trip is billed as a single transaction. This merging creates a convenient door-to-door experience while reducing overall AV mileage and environmental impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Object-generated harmful factors

If personal mobility vehicles are used for transportation, then environmental impact is reduced, but availability and coordination difficulty worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoidcoordination of transportation modes
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle autonomously delivers the personal mobility vehicle to the passenger's specified location and picks it up after use, without requiring manual coordination. The system automatically manages the PMV's location, charging, and maintenance, eliminating the coordination burden from the user while promoting environmentally friendly transportation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If autonomous vehicles carry personal mobility vehicles, then service versatility is improved, but vehicle complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-modal transportation capabilityVSAvoidautonomous vehicle configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle is designed with universal capabilities to transport different types of personal mobility vehicles (scooters, bicycles, skateboards). A single AV model can serve multiple functions: traditional passenger transport, PMV delivery, and PMV retrieval. This universality achieves multi-modal transportation versatility without requiring specialized complex configurations for each vehicle type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If multi-modal trip routing is implemented, then trip optimization is improved, but computational complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrip efficiencyVSAvoidrouting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system pre-calculates and stores optimal multi-modal trip routes, considering factors like PMV availability, charging locations, and transfer points. When a user requests a trip, the system quickly retrieves and presents pre-analyzed route options rather than computing everything in real-time. This preliminary action achieves trip optimization while managing computational complexity through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances efficiency and reduces costs by enabling door-to-door travel with reduced environmental impact, improving user convenience by simplifying the coordination of various transportation modes and incentivizing the use of eco-friendly options, while addressing traffic congestion and personal mobility vehicle availability.

Implementation Method 1

The autonomous vehicle is configured to provide charge from the battery to the personal mobility vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical energy transfer: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS11808587B2Autonomous vehicle multi-modal trips
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 GM CRUISE HOLDINGS LLC
  • US11808587B2 patent drawing
  • US11808587B2 patent drawing
  • US11808587B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for multi-modal trips. Systems and methods are provided for integrating multiple legs of a trip using different modes of transportation into a single, personalized transportation experience. In particular, systems and methods are provided for integrating multiple modes of transportation, such as an electric scooter ride and an autonomous vehicle ride, into a single trip.