Autonomous Vehicle Pickup Routing and Traffic Impact Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in determining optimal waiting patterns when arriving to pick up users, as they must balance traffic impact and user arrival time, often leading to inefficiencies and potential traffic congestion.

Innovation Solution

The system uses a computing system to assess traffic data and user arrival information to decide whether to stop in a travel lane or re-route, considering factors like traffic thresholds and user arrival estimates to minimize disruption and optimize waiting strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the autonomous vehicle stops in a travel lane to wait for the user, then the user pickup service is provided, but traffic congestion increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser pickup serviceVSAvoidtraffic congestion
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a computing system as an intermediary that coordinates between the autonomous vehicle, user devices, and traffic management. This system enables the vehicle to communicate with users about arrival times and coordinates waiting actions, reducing unnecessary stops and traffic disruption while maintaining reliable user pickup service

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts vehicle waiting behavior based on real-time conditions including user arrival predictions, traffic patterns, and location characteristics. The autonomous vehicle can adapt its stopping duration and location dynamically rather than following fixed waiting patterns, optimizing the balance between user service and traffic flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the autonomous vehicle travels along a holding pattern route, then traffic impact is reduced, but user arrival time accuracy decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic impactVSAvoiduser arrival time accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where the computing system continuously monitors user device location data, predicts arrival times, and communicates updated estimates to users. This feedback mechanism maintains arrival time accuracy even when vehicles follow holding pattern routes, as users are informed of predicted arrival times based on their actual approach speed and distance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by notifying users of approaching vehicle arrival before the vehicle actually stops. Users receive advance notice and can prepare for pickup, reducing the perceived waiting time and maintaining accuracy expectations even when the vehicle follows optimized holding patterns rather than direct routing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the autonomous vehicle stops in a travel way, then user pickup is facilitated, but traffic flow is disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser pickup facilitationVSAvoidtraffic flow
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different waiting strategies based on local characteristics of the pickup location. Urban locations with high pedestrian activity receive different treatment than suburban locations, and locations near intersections differ from those on open roads. This localized approach optimizes user pickup facilitation while minimizing traffic disruption specific to each location's context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as stopping duration, stopping location offset from curb, and engine idle state based on traffic conditions and user characteristics. These parameter adjustments allow the vehicle to facilitate user pickup while adapting to local traffic flow requirements, reducing overall traffic disruption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Object-generated harmful factors

If the autonomous vehicle uses holding patterns, then traffic congestion is minimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic congestionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computing system performs multiple functions including traffic coordination, user communication, arrival prediction, and vehicle routing optimization. By consolidating these functions in a single multi-functional system rather than separate dedicated systems for each function, the overall system complexity is managed while achieving comprehensive traffic optimization through holding patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11385657B2Systems and methods for controlling autonomous vehicles that provide a vehicle service to users
Publication Date: 2022.07.12 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US11385657B2 patent drawing
  • US11385657B2 patent drawing
  • US11385657B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for controlling autonomous vehicles are provided. In one example embodiment, a computer implemented method includes obtaining data indicative of a location associated with a user to which an autonomous vehicle is to travel. The autonomous vehicle is to travel along a first vehicle route that leads to the location. The method includes obtaining traffic data associated with a geographic area that includes the location. The method includes determining an estimated traffic impact of the autonomous vehicle on the geographic area based at least in part on the traffic data. The method includes determining vehicle action(s) based at least in part on the estimated traffic impact and causing the autonomous vehicle to perform the vehicle action(s) that include at least one of stopping the autonomous vehicle at least partially in a travel way within a vicinity of the location or travelling along a second vehicle route.