Autonomous Vehicle Procession Detection for Traffic Rule Exceptions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in detecting and responding to processions, which involve groups of vehicles or persons moving together, as these situations invoke different traffic rules and require specific responses to ensure safe and effective autonomous driving.

Innovation Solution

A method using sensor data analysis to determine if objects are disobeying predetermined rules, identifying a procession based on thresholds of objects and time, and controlling the vehicle to respond appropriately, such as yielding, by integrating perception systems with map data and traffic rules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the autonomous vehicle uses standard traffic rules for decision-making, then normal traffic operation is maintained, but the vehicle cannot properly respond to processions which require different traffic rules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to respond to different traffic situationsVSAvoidcomplexity of traffic rule processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the detection process into distinct stages: identifying individual rule-breaking objects, determining if they form a group, classifying the group type (procession vs. other), and applying appropriate traffic rules. This segmentation allows the system to handle complex procession detection through manageable sub-tasks without overwhelming computational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary classification layer between standard traffic rule processing and specific procession response. This intermediary layer analyzes group characteristics and determines whether objects form a procession, serving as a bridge that adapts standard traffic rules to procession-specific requirements without requiring complete rule rewriting

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the vehicle detects and responds to processions by yielding and making special maneuvers, then safety is improved, but traffic flow efficiency may be reduced due to aggressive maneuvers and stops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of autonomous drivingVSAvoidtraffic flow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts vehicle behavior based on real-time procession detection. Rather than static pre-programmed responses, the autonomous vehicle continuously monitors for procession conditions and adapts its traffic rule application accordingly, allowing flexible balance between safety yielding and traffic flow maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (such as speed, stopping distance, right-of-way decisions) based on procession detection results. When a procession is identified, the vehicle modifies its normal operating parameters to appropriate values for procession interaction, enabling safe response while minimizing disruption to overall traffic flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the vehicle requires multiple objects disobeying rules over a period of time to confirm a procession, then false positives are reduced, but detection response time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of procession detectionVSAvoiddetection response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of rule-breaking objects and maintains a buffer of observed objects before confirming procession status. This preliminary action allows the system to quickly identify potential processions while requiring sufficient evidence (multiple objects over time) to confirm, balancing early detection with false positive prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from continuous monitoring of road objects to refine procession detection. As objects are observed disobeying rules, the system feeds this information back into the detection algorithm, which adjusts its confidence level and response timing based on the accumulating evidence, optimizing both accuracy and response time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11860631B2Detecting and responding to processions for autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 WAYMO LLC
  • US11860631B2 patent drawing
  • US11860631B2 patent drawing
  • US11860631B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology relates to detecting and responding to processions. For instance, sensor data identifying two or more objects in an environment of a vehicle may be received. The two or more objects may be determined to be disobeying a predetermined rule in a same way. Based on the determination that the two or more objects are disobeying a predetermined rule, that the two or more objects are involved in a procession may be determined. The vehicle may then be controlled autonomously in order to respond to the procession based on the determination that the two or more objects are involved in a procession.