Autonomous Vehicle With Rotating Shelf For Warehouse Ergonomics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-motorized carts become cumbersome to move when fully loaded with goods in warehouses, necessitating a more efficient transportation solution for order fulfillment and distribution.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle equipped with a base assembly, rack assembly, and processing system, featuring Mecanum wheels, a rotating storage shelf, and a light projector, which enables autonomous navigation, item location determination, and ergonomic positioning of shelves for efficient loading and unloading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If non-motorized carts are used for transporting goods, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases due to cumbersome movement when fully loaded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation efficiencyVSAvoidvehicle structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle is divided into modular components: base assembly with drive system, rack assembly with storage shelves, and coupling assembly with bearing assemblies. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each module while maintaining overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle integrates multiple functions into a single platform: autonomous navigation via processors and sensors, motorized propulsion, rotating storage shelves for ergonomic access, and light projection for route guidance. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by consolidating capabilities that would otherwise require separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If storage shelves are fixed on the platform, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates due to poor ergonomic access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic accessVSAvoidcoupling mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The storage shelves are transformed from static to dynamic components through the coupling assembly with bearing assemblies, enabling rotation and repositioning. This allows the shelves to adapt their position based on operational needs, improving ergonomic access while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The bearing assemblies enable the storage shelves to rotate and move in multiple dimensions relative to the platform, not just linearly. This dimensional freedom provides ergonomic access from various angles and positions, resolving the contradiction between operational ease and structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If autonomous navigation is implemented, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases due to processing systems and sensors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operationVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous navigation components (processors, sensors, light projectors) are merged with the vehicle's existing structural elements. The processing system is integrated into the base assembly, and light projectors are mounted on existing components, reducing overall system complexity while enabling autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing system serves multiple functions: autonomous navigation, route planning, obstacle detection, and coordination of storage shelf positioning. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by consolidating control capabilities that would otherwise require separate dedicated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If light projectors are added for route guidance, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute visibilityVSAvoidillumination system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The light projectors act as intermediaries between the autonomous navigation system and the physical environment, projecting visual guides onto the floor to communicate route information. This intermediary function improves operator awareness and ease of operation without requiring direct mechanical modifications to the vehicle's core systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The illumination system replaces or supplements mechanical guidance mechanisms with optical signals. Instead of physical markers or mechanical indicators, the vehicle uses projected light patterns to guide operators, reducing mechanical complexity while enhancing operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11427121B2Vehicle for container transport
Publication Date: 2022.08.30 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US11427121B2 patent drawing
  • US11427121B2 patent drawing
  • US11427121B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle can include a base assembly, a rack assembly, and a processing system. The base assembly can include a platform, a plurality of wheels and a motor for driving at least one of the plurality of wheels. The rack assembly can include a storage shelf connected to the base assembly through a coupling, which includes a bearing assembly enabling the storage shelf to rotate with respect to the platform. The processing system can be configured to communicatively couple with the rack assembly and include one or more processors configured to: determine a location of a target good; cause the storage shelf to move based on the determined location.