Autonomous Vehicle Speed Control for Driver-Preferred Traffic Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles lack the ability to dynamically adjust speed based on driver preferences in various traffic scenarios, relying solely on predefined speed limits or adaptive cruise control systems that do not account for individual driving styles or specific traffic conditions.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous vehicle system that receives input from the driver for multiple speed preferences corresponding to different triggering situations, uses sensor data to identify relevant objects, and adjusts speed accordingly based on processor calculations to maintain preferred speeds in relation to surrounding traffic.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the autonomous vehicle uses predefined speed limits or adaptive cruise control systems, then the basic speed control function is provided, but the system cannot dynamically adjust speed based on driver preferences in various traffic scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed adjustment adaptabilityVSAvoidspeed control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the autonomous vehicle's speed by switching between multiple speed preferences (first, second, and third speed preferences) based on detected traffic conditions. The processor selects different speed profiles depending on whether traffic is heavy, moderate, or light, enabling the vehicle to adapt its speed control behavior to varying driving scenarios rather than using a fixed speed control mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the speed parameter by selecting from multiple predefined speed preferences corresponding to different traffic conditions. Each speed preference represents a different set of speed parameters (maximum speed, acceleration rate, following distance), and the processor dynamically switches between these parameter sets based on sensor input, allowing the vehicle to optimize its speed behavior for current traffic conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the autonomous vehicle uses multiple speed preferences for different traffic scenarios, then the adaptability to traffic conditions is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic scenario adaptabilityVSAvoidprocessor control logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The speed control system is segmented into multiple discrete speed preferences (first, second, and third speed preferences), each optimized for specific traffic conditions. The processor evaluates traffic conditions and selects the appropriate segmented speed preference, breaking down the complex task of continuous speed optimization into manageable discrete choices based on traffic density and flow patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring traffic conditions through sensors and adjusting the selected speed preference accordingly. The processor receives feedback about current traffic state (heavy, moderate, or light traffic) and dynamically switches between speed preferences to maintain optimal speed behavior, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle continuously monitors traffic conditions and adjusts speed dynamically, then the safety and comfort are enhanced, but the computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving safetyVSAvoidsensor and processor requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses partial monitoring by focusing on key traffic condition parameters (traffic density, flow speed, distance to other vehicles) rather than comprehensively analyzing all possible environmental factors. The processor evaluates only the necessary conditions to determine which speed preference to apply, implementing sufficient rather than exhaustive monitoring to achieve safe and comfortable speed control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system prepares multiple speed preferences in advance, each pre-configured for specific traffic scenarios. Rather than calculating optimal speed in real-time from scratch, the processor selects from pre-computed speed preferences based on current conditions, reducing computational burden while maintaining safety and comfort through proactive preparation of speed strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11807235B1Modifying speed of an autonomous vehicle based on traffic conditions
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 WAYMO LLC
  • US11807235B1 patent drawing
  • US11807235B1 patent drawing
  • US11807235B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure relate generally to speed control in an autonomous vehicle. For example, an autonomous vehicle may include a user interface which allows the driver to input speed preferences. These preferences may include the maximum speed above the speed limit the user would like the autonomous vehicle to drive when other vehicles are present and driving above or below certain speeds. The other vehicles may be in adjacent or the same lane the vehicle, and need not be in front of the vehicle.