Autonomous Vehicle Spin Control for Sharp Turn Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in navigating sharp turns without operator intervention, as existing systems rely on pre-mapped annotations and lack the ability to dynamically avoid obstacles by spinning in place.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that includes a spin controller, triggered by a model predictive controller, which enables an autonomous vehicle to spin in place by determining the necessary axis of rotation and path to a destination, avoiding obstacles by calculating angles and paths using occupancy grid data and adjusting rotation direction as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If autonomous vehicles rely on pre-mapped annotations for sharp turns, then the navigation system can handle known sharp turns, but the system cannot dynamically respond to obstacles or unmarked turns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedynamic obstacle avoidance capabilityVSAvoidnavigation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The navigation system transitions from static pre-mapped annotations to dynamic real-time path planning. The model predictive controller continuously calculates optimal paths based on current occupancy grid data, enabling the vehicle to adapt to dynamic obstacles and unmarked turns without requiring complex manual reprogramming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-navigation through sharp turns and obstacle avoidance without operator intervention. The spin controller and model predictive controller work together to autonomously determine rotation directions, calculate paths, and execute maneuvers, making the system self-sufficient for handling complex navigation scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If the autonomous vehicle spins in place to navigate sharp turns, then the vehicle can reach destinations requiring sharp turns, but the control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesharp turn navigation capabilityVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into distinct functional modules: the model predictive controller for path planning, the spin controller for execution, and the occupancy grid processor for obstacle detection. This segmentation allows each component to handle specific tasks, simplifying the overall control architecture while enabling complex spin maneuvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spin controller acts as an intermediary between the model predictive controller's path planning and the vehicle's physical execution. It translates high-level navigation commands into specific wheel control signals, managing the complexity of spin maneuvers through a dedicated control layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11543826B2System and method for navigating a turn by an autonomous vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 DEKA PRODUCTS LP
  • US11543826B2 patent drawing
  • US11543826B2 patent drawing
  • US11543826B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Spin controller that can enable an autonomous vehicle (AV) to spin in place. A model predictive controller (MPC) can trigger the spin controller any time the MPC determines that a spin in place is required. In some configurations, the spin controller can move the AV to within 5° of the destination point. Spin controller can determine spin method based on the configuration of the AV, calculate an optimum turning path based at least on device mode and obstacles, and can enable the AV to spin in place.