Autonomous Vehicle Stop-Request Trajectory Replanning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in responding effectively to requests for immediate or speed-reducing maneuvers, particularly in identifying suitable target locations and adapting trajectory plans in dynamic environments.

Innovation Solution

The system enables autonomous vehicles to analyze various data sources, including sensor data, map data, and user inputs, to identify and adapt to target locations for speed-reducing maneuvers, such as stopping, by evaluating factors like urgency, quality, and availability, and continuously updating the trajectory plan based on real-time conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the AV system immediately executes a stop request signal, then the response time is reduced, but the safety and appropriateness of the stopping location may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse time to stop requestVSAvoidsafety of stopping location
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-identifies and evaluates multiple candidate target locations for potential stopping maneuvers before a stop request is made. When a stop request signal is received, the system can immediately select from pre-evaluated candidates, reducing response time while maintaining safety through prior analysis of location suitability factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the AV system evaluates multiple factors and continuously updates trajectory plans, then the safety and accuracy of maneuver execution is improved, but the computational complexity and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of maneuver executionVSAvoidcomputational processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex decision-making process into distinct modular components: candidate location identification, factor evaluation (safety, legality, suitability), trajectory planning, and real-time adjustment. Each module processes specific aspects independently, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining comprehensive evaluation through structured segmentation of the problem space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If the AV system maintains a fixed trajectory plan, then the computational load is reduced, but the system cannot adapt to changing road conditions or unavailable target locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational loadVSAvoidadaptability to changing conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic trajectory planning where the trajectory plan is continuously updated based on real-time sensor data, changing road conditions, and availability of target locations. The system monitors environmental factors and automatically adjusts the trajectory plan to maintain safety and achieve the stopping objective, transitioning from static to dynamic adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If the AV system considers multiple target locations and continuously updates status, then the reliability of maneuver completion is improved, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaneuver completion reliabilityVSAvoidtime for location evaluation and updates
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates multiple candidate target locations but implements prioritization and threshold-based selection. Instead of exhaustively analyzing all possible locations, the system identifies a limited set of high-priority candidates meeting minimum criteria, selects the best option, and proceeds with execution. This partial evaluation approach achieves sufficient reliability without the time cost of complete exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260042454A1Processing a request signal regarding operation of an autonomous vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 MOTIONAL AD LLC
  • US20260042454A1 patent drawing
  • US20260042454A1 patent drawing
  • US20260042454A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Among other things, a vehicle drives autonomously on a trajectory through a road network to a goal location based on an automatic process for planning the trajectory without human intervention; and an automatic process alters the planning of the trajectory to reach a target location based on a request received from an occupant of the vehicle to engage in a speed-reducing maneuver.