Autonomous Vehicle Warning Light Timing for Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional autonomous driving vehicle systems face challenges in accurately determining relative distance and speed, especially when navigating intersections or curves, leading to inappropriate warnings for following vehicles, and thus may increase the risk of collisions.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous driving vehicle system that includes a surrounding information detection unit, an electronic control unit with a travel plan generation unit, a traveling control unit, and a warning light control unit to turn on warning lights earlier than the vehicle's braking time, reducing the possibility of collisions by providing earlier alerts to following vehicles, and adjusting braking strategies based on emergency levels, obstacle information, and environmental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the vehicle uses conventional brake control with time-to-collision calculation, then the system structure is simple, but the warning accuracy deteriorates when the vehicle turns or travels through curves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelative distance and speed measurement accuracyVSAvoidsurrounding environment detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous driving vehicle system integrates multiple detection functions (distance measurement, speed measurement, surrounding environment recognition) into a single comprehensive system. The arithmetic unit calculates time-to-collision while the surrounding environment recognition unit detects objects and road conditions, creating a multi-functional system that maintains accuracy during turns and curve traversal without requiring separate specialized systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the vehicle turns right or left at an intersection or travels through a curve using conventional methods, then the system operation is straightforward, but the warning appropriateness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturning and curve traversal operationVSAvoidwarning appropriateness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of surrounding environment and calculates time-to-collision before the vehicle actually turns or enters a curve. The arithmetic unit pre-calculates warning timing based on detected relative distance and speed, allowing the system to prepare appropriate warnings in advance. This preliminary action ensures warning appropriateness is maintained during dynamic maneuvers without complicating the actual turning operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the vehicle provides early warning to following vehicles, then the collision prevention effectiveness is improved, but the energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision prevention effectivenessVSAvoidwarning light energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The warning light is activated in advance of actual braking based on pre-calculated time-to-collision values. The arithmetic unit determines the optimal warning timing before the brake light would normally illuminate, allowing following vehicles to prepare for potential braking. This preliminary warning action prevents collisions while the warning light consumes energy only when necessary, avoiding continuous operation and reducing overall energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Speed

If the vehicle applies higher deceleration for emergency braking, then the stopping distance is reduced, but the collision risk with following vehicles increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeceleration rateVSAvoidcollision risk for following vehicle
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary braking action by activating the warning light before actual emergency braking occurs. The arithmetic unit calculates the optimal timing to illuminate the warning light in advance of high-deceleration braking, giving following vehicles time to react. This preliminary warning allows the vehicle to maintain higher deceleration rates for stopping while reducing collision risk through early notification to following drivers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9981658B2Autonomous driving vehicle system
Publication Date: 2018.05.29 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US9981658B2 patent drawing
  • US9981658B2 patent drawing
  • US9981658B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous driving vehicle system includes: a surrounding information detection unit that is configured to detect surrounding information on a vehicle; and at least one electronic control unit including: a travel plan generation unit configured to generate a travel plan along a pre-set target route based on the surrounding information and map information; a traveling control unit configured to autonomously control a traveling of the vehicle based on the travel plan; and a warning light control unit configured to turn on a warning light earlier than a start time of a braking of the vehicle in the travel plan, the warning light informing a following vehicle about the braking.