Autonomous Crop Weeding Blades With Adaptive Gap Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current agricultural technologies lack an efficient and autonomous method for weeding crops in agricultural fields, often resulting in manual labor and potential damage to target plants.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous agricultural vehicle equipped with a weeding module that adjusts its blade gap width and speed based on crop type, maturity, and soil conditions, while also requesting verification from a remote human operator when parameters deviate significantly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual weeding is used, then labor flexibility is maintained, but labor costs and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweeding efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle performs weeding operations independently by detecting target plants, adjusting blade parameters, and executing weeding actions without continuous human intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously navigating fields, identifying weeds, and performing mechanical weeding, thereby eliminating manual labor while maintaining operational simplicity through automated decision-making algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical weeding with an automated mechanical system. The autonomous vehicle uses computer vision and control systems to substitute human operators, while the physical weeding action remains mechanical through blade-based plant removal. This substitution maintains the simplicity of mechanical weeding while eliminating labor-intensive operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If fixed blade gap width is used, then device simplicity is maintained, but plant damage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplant safetyVSAvoidparameter adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade gap width transitions from a fixed parameter to a dynamic parameter that adjusts in real-time based on detected plant characteristics. The system continuously monitors target plant size and modifies blade gap width accordingly, enabling the mechanical weeding system to adapt to varying plant dimensions and prevent damage to larger target plants while maintaining simplicity through automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the blade gap width parameter dynamically during operation based on detected plant characteristics. The system measures target plant dimensions and adjusts the blade gap width parameter to ensure safe passage of larger plants while effectively removing smaller weeds. This parameter adaptation improves plant safety without requiring complex mechanical reconfiguration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If autonomous operation is implemented, then labor requirements are reduced, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidvehicle system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous vehicle integrates multiple functions into a single platform: navigation, plant detection, parameter adjustment, and mechanical weeding. By combining these functions in one universal system, the patent reduces overall operational complexity despite increased device complexity, as the unified system manages all tasks through integrated control algorithms and shared hardware components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback by continuously detecting target plants, measuring their characteristics, adjusting blade parameters based on detected information, and verifying weeding effectiveness. This feedback mechanism enables autonomous operation with simplified decision-making logic, where each operational cycle learns from previous detections and adjustments, reducing the need for complex pre-programming

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250048948A1Method for autonomously weeding crops in an agricultural field
Publication Date: 2025.02.13 FARMWISE LABS INC
  • US20250048948A1 patent drawing
  • US20250048948A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One variation of a method for executing agricultural actions on an agricultural field includes: based a type of a crop planted on the agricultural field and a maturity of the crop, setting a nominal blade gap width of a weeding module installed in an autonomous agricultural vehicle; and, at the autonomous agricultural vehicle, while autonomously traversing the agricultural field, detecting a first target plant passing under the autonomous agricultural vehicle and aligned with the weeding module, triggering the weeding module to open a set of weeding blades to the nominal blade gap width at a nominal blade speed in response to the first target plant approaching the weeding module, and triggering the weeding module to close the set of weeding blades in response to the first target plant passing the weeding module.